mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Should I disclose my dataset? Caveats between reproducibility and individual data rights

arXiv 2211.00498 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2022cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Natural language processing techniques have helped domain experts solve legal problems. Digital availability of court documents increases possibilities for researchers, who can access them as a source for building datasets -- whose disclosure is aligned with good reproducibility practices in computational research. Large and digitized court systems, such as the Brazilian one, are prone to be explored in that sense. However, personal data protection laws impose restrictions on data exposure and state principles about which researchers should be mindful. Special caution must be taken in cases with human rights violations, such as gender discrimination, over which we elaborate as an example of interest. We present legal and ethical considerations on the issue, as well as guidelines for researchers dealing with this kind of data and deciding whether to disclose it.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.