Out-of-distribution Reject Option Method for Dataset Shift Problem in Early Disease Onset Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning is increasingly used to predict lifestyle-related disease onset using health and medical data. However, its predictive accuracy for use is often hindered by dataset shift, which refers to discrepancies in data distribution between the training and testing datasets. This issue leads to the misclassification of out-of-distribution (OOD) data. To diminish dataset shift in real-world settings, this paper proposes the out-of-distribution reject option for prediction (ODROP). This method integrates an OOD detection model to preclude OOD data from the prediction phase. We used two real-world health checkup datasets (Hirosaki and Wakayama) with dataset shift, across three disease onset prediction tasks: diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Both components of ODROP method -- the OOD detection model and the prediction model -- were trained on the Hirosaki dataset. We assessed the effectiveness of ODROP on the Wakayama dataset using AUROC-rejection rate curve plot. In the five OOD detection approaches (the variational autoencoder, neural network ensemble std, neural network ensemble epistemic, neural network energy, and neural network gaussian mixture based energy measurement), the variational autoencoder method demonstrated notably higher stability and a greater improvement in AUROC. For example, in the Wakayama dataset, the AUROC for diabetes onset increased from 0.80 without ODROP to 0.90 at a 31.1% rejection rate, and for dyslipidemia, it improved from 0.70 without ODROP to 0.76 at a 34% rejection rate. In addition, we categorized dataset shifts into two types using SHAP clustering -- those that considerably affect predictions and those that do not. This study is the first to apply OOD detection to actual health and medical data, demonstrating its potential to substantially improve the accuracy and reliability of disease prediction models amidst dataset shift.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.
Builds on
15 of 44 references.
References · 15
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,299
- 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 802
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 680
- 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 453
- 2021On the Importance of Gradients for Detecting Distributional Shifts in the Wildcited by 339
- 2021A Unified Survey on Anomaly, Novelty, Open-Set, and Out-of-Distribution Detection: Solutions and Future Challengescited by 154
- 2020Likelihood Regret: An Out-of-Distribution Detection Score For Variational Auto-encodercited by 145
- 2021Machine Learning with a Reject Option: A surveycited by 109
- 2021Provable Guarantees for Understanding Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 78
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.