mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Contrastive-Adversarial and Diffusion: Exploring pre-training and fine-tuning strategies for sulcal identification

arXiv 2405.19204 ↗First posted 29 May 2024eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the last decade, computer vision has witnessed the establishment of various training and learning approaches. Techniques like adversarial learning, contrastive learning, diffusion denoising learning, and ordinary reconstruction learning have become standard, representing state-of-the-art methods extensively employed for fully training or pre-training networks across various vision tasks. The exploration of fine-tuning approaches has emerged as a current focal point, addressing the need for efficient model tuning with reduced GPU memory usage and time costs while enhancing overall performance, as exemplified by methodologies like low-rank adaptation (LoRA). Key questions arise: which pre-training technique yields optimal results - adversarial, contrastive, reconstruction, or diffusion denoising? How does the performance of these approaches vary as the complexity of fine-tuning is adjusted? This study aims to elucidate the advantages of pre-training techniques and fine-tuning strategies to enhance the learning process of neural networks in independent identical distribution (IID) cohorts. We underscore the significance of fine-tuning by examining various cases, including full tuning, decoder tuning, top-level tuning, and fine-tuning of linear parameters using LoRA. Systematic summaries of model performance and efficiency are presented, leveraging metrics such as accuracy, time cost, and memory efficiency. To empirically demonstrate our findings, we focus on a multi-task segmentation-classification challenge involving the paracingulate sulcus (PCS) using different 3D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures by using the TOP-OSLO cohort comprising 596 subjects.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2024.

Builds on

14 of 25 references.

References · 14

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2022Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Imagescited by 830
  4. 2023CoLa-Diff: Conditional Latent Diffusion Model for Multi-Modal MRI Synthesiscited by 65
  5. 2023DiffMix: Diffusion Model-based Data Synthesis for Nuclei Segmentation and Classification in Imbalanced Pathology Image Datasetscited by 28
  6. 2023Contrastive Diffusion Model with Auxiliary Guidance for Coarse-to-Fine PET Reconstructioncited by 18
  7. 2023ASCON: Anatomy-aware Supervised Contrastive Learning Framework for Low-dose CT Denoisingcited by 15
  8. 2023Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Segmentation using Transformation-Invariant Self-Trainingcited by 11
  9. 2023Annotator Consensus Prediction for Medical Image Segmentation with Diffusion Modelscited by 10
  10. 2023EPVT: Environment-aware Prompt Vision Transformer for Domain Generalization in Skin Lesion Recognitioncited by 9
  11. 2023Semi-supervised Domain Adaptive Medical Image Segmentation through Consistency Regularized Disentangled Contrastive Learningcited by 7
  12. 2023Faithful Synthesis of Low-dose Contrast-enhanced Brain MRI Scans using Noise-preserving Conditional GANscited by 5
2 more
  1. 2023Self-supervised learning via inter-modal reconstruction and feature projection networks for label-efficient 3D-to-2D segmentationcited by 5
  2. 2023Improved Multi-Shot Diffusion-Weighted MRI with Zero-Shot Self-Supervised Learning Reconstructioncited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.