mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Are You Sure? Rank Them Again: Repeated Ranking For Better Preference Datasets

arXiv 2405.18952 ↗First posted 29 May 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Training Large Language Models (LLMs) with Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF) aligns model outputs more closely with human preferences. This involves an evaluator model ranking multiple candidate responses to user prompts. However, the rankings from popular evaluator models such as GPT-4 can be inconsistent. We propose the Repeat Ranking method - where we evaluate the same responses multiple times and train only on those responses which are consistently ranked. Using 2,714 prompts in 62 languages, we generated responses from 7 top multilingual LLMs and had GPT-4 rank them five times each. Evaluating on MT-Bench chat benchmarks in six languages, our method outperformed the standard practice of training on all available prompts. Our work highlights the quality versus quantity trade-off in RLAIF dataset generation and offers a stackable strategy for enhancing dataset and thus model quality.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 19 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2024.

Builds on

19 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
  2. 2024Model Extrapolation Expedites Alignment25 Apr
  3. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment14 Apr
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 15

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  6. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  7. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  8. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
  9. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  10. 2023LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusioncited by 550
  11. 2023The Belebele Benchmark: a Parallel Reading Comprehension Dataset in 122 Language Variantscited by 300
  12. 2023From Pretraining Data to Language Models to Downstream Tasks: Tracking the Trails of Political Biases Leading to Unfair NLP Modelscited by 257
3 more
  1. 2023Assessing Cross-Cultural Alignment between ChatGPT and Human Societies: An Empirical Studycited by 203
  2. 2024Teaching Large Language Models to Reason with Reinforcement Learningcited by 158
  3. 2023DeepSpeed-Chat: Easy, Fast and Affordable RLHF Training of ChatGPT-like Models at All Scalescited by 107

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Limits of Preference Data for Post-Training
  2. 2024LiPO: Listwise Preference Optimization through Learning-to-Rank
  3. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback
  4. 2025Dropping Just a Handful of Preferences Can Change Top Large Language Model Rankings
  5. 2024Optimizing LLMs with Direct Preferences: A Data Efficiency Perspective
  6. 2023Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignment
  7. 2025Beyond Pairwise: Empowering LLM Alignment With Ranked Choice Modeling
  8. 2025HelpSteer3-Preference: Open Human-Annotated Preference Data across Diverse Tasks and Languages