mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Green AI in Action: Strategic Model Selection for Ensembles in Production

arXiv 2405.17451 ↗First posted 21 May 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into software systems has significantly enhanced their capabilities while escalating energy demands. Ensemble learning, combining predictions from multiple models to form a single prediction, intensifies this problem due to cumulative energy consumption. This paper presents a novel approach to model selection that addresses the challenge of balancing the accuracy of AI models with their energy consumption in a live AI ensemble system. We explore how reducing the number of models or improving the efficiency of model usage within an ensemble during inference can reduce energy demands without substantially sacrificing accuracy. This study introduces and evaluates two model selection strategies, Static and Dynamic, for optimizing ensemble learning systems performance while minimizing energy usage. Our results demonstrate that the Static strategy improves the F1 score beyond the baseline, reducing average energy usage from 100% from the full ensemble to 62%. The Dynamic strategy further enhances F1 scores, using on average 76% compared to 100% of the full ensemble. Moreover, we propose an approach that balances accuracy with resource consumption, significantly reducing energy usage without substantially impacting accuracy. This method decreased the average energy usage of the Static strategy from approximately 62% to 14%, and for the Dynamic strategy, from around 76% to 57%. Our field study of Green AI using an operational AI system developed by a large professional services provider shows the practical applicability of adopting energy-conscious model selection strategies in live production environments.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2024.

Builds on

18 of 48 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
  2. 2019Green AIcited by 620
  3. 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 420
  4. 2017Snapshot Ensembles: Train 1, get M for freecited by 349
  5. 2023MEGA: Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AIcited by 291
  6. 2021Ensemble deep learning: A reviewcited by 283
  7. 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 246
  8. 2021Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 242
  9. 2021CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Reviewcited by 232
  10. 2020Carbontracker: Tracking and Predicting the Carbon Footprint of Training Deep Learning Modelscited by 168
  11. 2023A Systematic Review of Green AIcited by 77
  12. 2020A Benchmark for Lease Contract Reviewcited by 26
6 more
  1. 2023Watt For What: Rethinking Deep Learning's Energy-Performance Relationshipcited by 16
  2. 2022Prune and Tune Ensembles: Low-Cost Ensemble Learning With Sparse Independent Subnetworkscited by 13
  3. 2023Towards Inference Efficient Deep Ensemble Learningcited by 11
  4. 2019Particle Swarm Optimisation for Evolving Deep Neural Networks for Image Classification by Evolving and Stacking Transferable Blockscited by 8
  5. 2022Differentiable Model Selection for Ensemble Learningcited by 5
  6. 2023A post-selection algorithm for improving dynamic ensemble selection methodscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.