Models That Prove Their Own Correctness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
How can we trust the correctness of a learned model on a particular input of interest? Model accuracy is typically measured on average over a distribution of inputs, giving no guarantee for any fixed input. This paper proposes a theoretically-founded solution to this problem: to train Self-Proving models that prove the correctness of their output to a verification algorithm V via an Interactive Proof. Self-Proving models satisfy that, with high probability over an input sampled from a given distribution, the model generates a correct output and successfully proves its correctness to V. The soundness property of V guarantees that, for every input, no model can convince V of the correctness of an incorrect output. Thus, a Self-Proving model proves correctness of most of its outputs, while all incorrect outputs (of any model) are detected by V. We devise and analyze two generic methods for learning Self-Proving models: Transcript Learning (TL) which relies on access to transcripts of accepting interactions, and Reinforcement Learning from Verifier Feedback (RLVF) which trains a model by emulating interactions with the verifier.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2024.
Builds on
32 of 82 references.
References · 32
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,081
- 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 871
- 2018Universal Transformerscited by 613
- 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 572
- 2023LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 414
- 2018AI safety via debatecited by 384
20 more
- 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 379
- 2019Analysing Mathematical Reasoning Abilities of Neural Modelscited by 331
- 2017Overcoming Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Demonstrationscited by 322
- 2020ProofWriter: Generating Implications, Proofs, and Abductive Statements over Natural Languagecited by 309
- 2023Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPTcited by 263
- 2022Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 158
- 2020Better Theory for SGD in the Nonconvex Worldcited by 156
- 2021Investigating the Limitations of Transformers with Simple Arithmetic Taskscited by 136
- 2023Teaching Arithmetic to Small Transformerscited by 121
- 2023Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth? Evaluating LLM Reasoning via Debatecited by 92
- 2020On the Computational Power of Transformers and its Implications in Sequence Modelingcited by 85
- 2022NaturalProver: Grounded Mathematical Proof Generation with Language Modelscited by 72
- 2023Auto-Regressive Next-Token Predictors are Universal Learnerscited by 65
- 2021Linear algebra with transformerscited by 62
- 2023Scalable AI Safety via Doubly-Efficient Debatecited by 54
- 2022Chain of Thought Imitation with Procedure Cloningcited by 30
- 2021Learning to Give Checkable Answers with Prover-Verifier Gamescited by 29
- 2013Time-Optimal Interactive Proofs for Circuit Evaluationcited by 14
- 2022Interpretability Guarantees with Merlin-Arthur Classifierscited by 8
- 2015SEPIA: Search for Proofs Using Inferred Automatacited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2025Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Followingcited by 178
- 2024Prover-Verifier Games improve legibility of LLM outputscited by 79
- 2025Avoiding Obfuscation with Prover-Estimator Debatecited by 11
- 2025On Learning Verifiers and Implications to Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 6
- 2026Zero knowledge verification for frontier AI training is possiblecited by 2
- 2025Neural Concept Verifier: Scaling Prover-Verifier Games via Concept Encodingscited by 0
- 2026Zero knowledge verification for frontier AI training is possible3 Jun 2026
- 2025Neural Concept Verifier: Scaling Prover-Verifier Games via Concept Encodings10 Jul 2025
- 2025Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Following3 Jul 2025
- 2025Avoiding Obfuscation with Prover-Estimator Debate16 Jun 2025
- 2025On Learning Verifiers and Implications to Chain-of-Thought Reasoning28 May 2025
- 2024Prover-Verifier Games improve legibility of LLM outputs18 Jul 2024