mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fine-Grained Dynamic Framework for Bias-Variance Joint Optimization on Data Missing Not at Random

arXiv 2405.15403 ↗First posted 24 May 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In most practical applications such as recommendation systems, display advertising, and so forth, the collected data often contains missing values and those missing values are generally missing-not-at-random, which deteriorates the prediction performance of models. Some existing estimators and regularizers attempt to achieve unbiased estimation to improve the predictive performance. However, variances and generalization bound of these methods are generally unbounded when the propensity scores tend to zero, compromising their stability and robustness. In this paper, we first theoretically reveal that limitations of regularization techniques. Besides, we further illustrate that, for more general estimators, unbiasedness will inevitably lead to unbounded variance. These general laws inspire us that the estimator designs is not merely about eliminating bias, reducing variance, or simply achieve a bias-variance trade-off. Instead, it involves a quantitative joint optimization of bias and variance. Then, we develop a systematic fine-grained dynamic learning framework to jointly optimize bias and variance, which adaptively selects an appropriate estimator for each user-item pair according to the predefined objective function. With this operation, the generalization bounds and variances of models are reduced and bounded with theoretical guarantees. Extensive experiments are conducted to verify the theoretical results and the effectiveness of the proposed dynamic learning framework.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2024.

Builds on

17 of 30 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
  2. 2018Entire Space Multi-Task Model: An Effective Approach for Estimating Post-Click Conversion Ratecited by 172
  3. 2021AutoDebias: Learning to Debias for Recommendationcited by 68
  4. 2019Large-scale Causal Approaches to Debiasing Post-click Conversion Rate Estimation with Multi-task Learningcited by 39
  5. 2021Modeling the Sequential Dependence among Audience Multi-step Conversions with Multi-task Learning in Targeted Display Advertisingcited by 39
  6. 2020Information Theoretic Counterfactual Learning from Missing-Not-At-Random Feedbackcited by 30
  7. 2019Missing Not at Random in Matrix Completion: The Effectiveness of Estimating Missingness Probabilities Under a Low Nuclear Norm Assumptioncited by 29
  8. 2019Asymmetric Tri-training for Debiasing Missing-Not-At-Random Explicit Feedbackcited by 28
  9. 2021Enhanced Doubly Robust Learning for Debiasing Post-click Conversion Rate Estimationcited by 28
  10. 2023Rethinking Cross-Domain Sequential Recommendation under Open-World Assumptionscited by 20
  11. 2022TDR-CL: Targeted Doubly Robust Collaborative Learning for Debiased Recommendationscited by 18
  12. 2022A Generalized Doubly Robust Learning Framework for Debiasing Post-Click Conversion Rate Predictioncited by 18
5 more
  1. 2022Multiple Robust Learning for Recommendationcited by 11
  2. 2023Neural Node Matching for Multi-Target Cross Domain Recommendationcited by 8
  3. 2024Doubly Calibrated Estimator for Recommendation on Data Missing Not At Randomcited by 7
  4. 2024Debiased Collaborative Filtering with Kernel-Based Causal Balancingcited by 6
  5. 2023Towards Open-world Cross-Domain Sequential Recommendation: A Model-Agnostic Contrastive Denoising Approachcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.