Enhancing Learning with Label Differential Privacy by Vector Approximation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Label differential privacy (DP) is a framework that protects the privacy of labels in training datasets, while the feature vectors are public. Existing approaches protect the privacy of labels by flipping them randomly, and then train a model to make the output approximate the privatized label. However, as the number of classes K increases, stronger randomization is needed, thus the performances of these methods become significantly worse. In this paper, we propose a vector approximation approach, which is easy to implement and introduces little additional computational overhead. Instead of flipping each label into a single scalar, our method converts each label into a random vector with K components, whose expectations reflect class conditional probabilities. Intuitively, vector approximation retains more information than scalar labels. A brief theoretical analysis shows that the performance of our method only decays slightly with K. Finally, we conduct experiments on both synthesized and real datasets, which validate our theoretical analysis as well as the practical performance of our method.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2024.
Builds on
27 of 44 references.
References · 27
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 364
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 272
- 2018Optimal approximation of continuous functions by very deep ReLU networkscited by 166
- 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 149
- 2021Deep Learning with Label Differential Privacycited by 117
- 2016Why Deep Neural Networks for Function Approximation?cited by 82
- 2019Calibration tests in multi-class classification: A unifying frameworkcited by 79
- 2021Calibrating Predictions to Decisions: A Novel Approach to Multi-Class Calibrationcited by 79
15 more
- 2016Discrete Distribution Estimation under Local Privacycited by 59
- 2021Antipodes of Label Differential Privacy: PATE and ALIBIcited by 52
- 2014Rates of Convergence for Nearest Neighbor Classificationcited by 46
- 2016Differential Privacy as a Mutual Information Constraintcited by 45
- 2017Privacy Loss in Apple's Implementation of Differential Privacy on MacOS 10.12cited by 43
- 2021Label differential privacy via clusteringcited by 20
- 2017Local nearest neighbour classification with applications to semi-supervised learningcited by 17
- 2022Regression with Label Differential Privacycited by 15
- 2019Minimax Rate Optimal Adaptive Nearest Neighbor Classification and Regressioncited by 11
- 2022Does Label Differential Privacy Prevent Label Inference Attacks?cited by 11
- 2021Does deep learning model calibration improve performance in class-imbalanced medical image classification?cited by 9
- 2022GeoPointGAN: Synthetic Spatial Data with Local Label Differential Privacycited by 9
- 2023Private Learning with Public Featurescited by 6
- 2023Optimal Unbiased Randomizers for Regression with Label Differential Privacycited by 6
- 2024Training Differentially Private Ad Prediction Models with Semi-Sensitive Featurescited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.