mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explainable automatic industrial carbon footprint estimation from bank transaction classification using natural language processing

arXiv 2405.14505 ↗First posted 23 May 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.CEcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Concerns about the effect of greenhouse gases have motivated the development of certification protocols to quantify the industrial carbon footprint (CF). These protocols are manual, work-intensive, and expensive. All of the above have led to a shift towards automatic data-driven approaches to estimate the CF, including Machine Learning (ML) solutions. Unfortunately, the decision-making processes involved in these solutions lack transparency from the end user's point of view, who must blindly trust their outcomes compared to intelligible traditional manual approaches. In this research, manual and automatic methodologies for CF estimation were reviewed, taking into account their transparency limitations. This analysis led to the proposal of a new explainable ML solution for automatic CF calculations through bank transaction classification. Consideration should be given to the fact that no previous research has considered the explainability of bank transaction classification for this purpose. For classification, different ML models have been employed based on their promising performance in the literature, such as Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Recursive Neural Networks. The results obtained were in the 90 % range for accuracy, precision, and recall evaluation metrics. From their decision paths, the proposed solution estimates the CO2 emissions associated with bank transactions. The explainability methodology is based on an agnostic evaluation of the influence of the input terms extracted from the descriptions of transactions using locally interpretable models. The explainability terms were automatically validated using a similarity metric over the descriptions of the target categories. Conclusively, the explanation performance is satisfactory in terms of the proximity of the explanations to the associated activity sector descriptions.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2024.

Builds on

13 of 74 references.

References · 13

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  2. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  3. 2015Explaining NonLinear Classification Decisions with Deep Taylor Decompositioncited by 250
  4. 2020A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learningcited by 227
  5. 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 213
  6. 2020Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 97
  7. 2018Model Agnostic Supervised Local Explanationscited by 83
  8. 2018Using the Tsetlin Machine to Learn Human-Interpretable Rules for High-Accuracy Text Categorization with Medical Applicationscited by 24
  9. 2020Explainable Matrix -- Visualization for Global and Local Interpretability of Random Forest Classification Ensemblescited by 23
  10. 2020Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: A reality rooted perspectivecited by 12
  11. 2024Detection of financial opportunities in micro-blogging data with a stacked classification systemcited by 6
  12. 2024Identifying Banking Transaction Descriptions via Support Vector Machine Short-Text Classification Based on a Specialized Labelled Corpuscited by 4
1 more
  1. 2022Enriching Artificial Intelligence Explanations with Knowledge Fragmentscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.

3 papers.