Emulating Full Participation: An Effective and Fair Client Selection Strategy for Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In federated learning, client selection is a critical problem that significantly impacts both model performance and fairness. Prior studies typically treat these two objectives separately, or balance them using simple weighting schemes. However, we observe that commonly used metrics for model performance and fairness often conflict with each other, and a straightforward weighted combination is insufficient to capture their complex interactions. To address this, we first propose two guiding principles that directly tackle the inherent conflict between the two metrics while reinforcing each other. Based on these principles, we formulate the client selection problem as a long-term optimization task, leveraging the Lyapunov function and the submodular nature of the problem to solve it effectively. Experiments show that the proposed method improves both model performance and fairness, guiding the system to converge comparably to full client participation. This improvement can be attributed to the fact that both model performance and fairness benefit from the diversity of the selected clients' data distributions. Our approach adaptively enhances this diversity by selecting clients based on their data distributions, thereby improving both model performance and fairness.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2024.
Builds on
30 of 49 references.
References · 30
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
- 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 851
- 2020Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through Personalizationcited by 672
- 2020An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learningcited by 511
- 2020GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learningcited by 226
- 2020Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategiescited by 198
- 2022Federated Learning from Pre-Trained Models: A Contrastive Learning Approachcited by 142
- 2021FairFed: Enabling Group Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 118
18 more
- 2020Fairness-aware Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 87
- 2019Measure Contribution of Participants in Federated Learningcited by 79
- 2021GTG-Shapley: Efficient and Accurate Participant Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learningcited by 74
- 2019Active Federated Learningcited by 63
- 2020An Efficiency-boosting Client Selection Scheme for Federated Learning with Fairness Guaranteecited by 62
- 2022Client Selection in Federated Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 62
- 2021Towards Fairness-Aware Federated Learningcited by 58
- 2023Fair Federated Medical Image Segmentation via Client Contribution Estimationcited by 52
- 2020Verifying Individual Fairness in Machine Learning Modelscited by 49
- 2021Cluster-driven Graph Federated Learning over Multiple Domainscited by 44
- 2021FedCor: Correlation-Based Active Client Selection Strategy for Heterogeneous Federated Learningcited by 43
- 2023Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: on the Perspective of Trade-offcited by 26
- 2022Individual Fairness Guarantees for Neural Networkscited by 23
- 2023Accelerating Hybrid Federated Learning Convergence under Partial Participationcited by 15
- 2023Fairness-Aware Client Selection for Federated Learningcited by 15
- 2021FedCCEA : A Practical Approach of Client Contribution Evaluation for Federated Learningcited by 14
- 2021Coresets for Time Series Clusteringcited by 8
- 2024Ranking-based Client Selection with Imitation Learning for Efficient Federated Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.