mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Pragmatic auditing: a pilot-driven approach for auditing Machine Learning systems

arXiv 2405.13191 ↗First posted 21 May 2024cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The growing adoption and deployment of Machine Learning (ML) systems came with its share of ethical incidents and societal concerns. It also unveiled the necessity to properly audit these systems in light of ethical principles. For such a novel type of algorithmic auditing to become standard practice, two main prerequisites need to be available: A lifecycle model that is tailored towards transparency and accountability, and a principled risk assessment procedure that allows the proper scoping of the audit. Aiming to make a pragmatic step towards a wider adoption of ML auditing, we present a respective procedure that extends the AI-HLEG guidelines published by the European Commission. Our audit procedure is based on an ML lifecycle model that explicitly focuses on documentation, accountability, and quality assurance; and serves as a common ground for alignment between the auditors and the audited organisation. We describe two pilots conducted on real-world use cases from two different organisations and discuss the shortcomings of ML algorithmic auditing as well as future directions thereof.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2024.

Builds on

14 of 47 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  2. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  3. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
  4. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  5. 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 243
  6. 2020Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claimscited by 163
  7. 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
  8. 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AIcited by 134
  9. 2019The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelinescited by 129
  10. 2020Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Databasecited by 95
  11. 2020Overcoming Failures of Imagination in AI Infused System Development and Deploymentcited by 22
  12. 2021The Sanction of Authority: Promoting Public Trust in AIcited by 19
2 more
  1. 2020A Methodology for Creating AI FactSheetscited by 15
  2. 2021Towards a Common Testing Terminology for Software Engineering and Data Science Expertscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.