mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CoCo Matrix: Taxonomy of Cognitive Contributions in Co-writing with Intelligent Agents

arXiv 2405.12438 ↗First posted 21 May 2024cs.HC cs.AI cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in employing intelligent agents in writing. Previous work emphasizes the evaluation of the quality of end product-whether it was coherent and polished, overlooking the journey that led to the product, which is an invaluable dimension of the creative process. To understand how to recognize human efforts in co-writing with intelligent writing systems, we adapt Flower and Hayes' cognitive process theory of writing and propose CoCo Matrix, a two-dimensional taxonomy of entropy and information gain, to depict the new human-agent co-writing model. We define four quadrants and situate thirty-four published systems within the taxonomy. Our research found that low entropy and high information gain systems are under-explored, yet offer promising future directions in writing tasks that benefit from the agent's divergent planning and the human's focused translation. CoCo Matrix, not only categorizes different writing systems but also deepens our understanding of the cognitive processes in human-agent co-writing. By analyzing minimal changes in the writing process, CoCo Matrix serves as a proxy for the writer's mental model, allowing writers to reflect on their contributions. This reflection is facilitated through the measured metrics of information gain and entropy, which provide insights irrespective of the writing system used.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2024.

Builds on

14 of 56 references.

References · 14

  1. 2022CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilitiescited by 245
  2. 2017Survey of the State of the Art in Natural Language Generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluationcited by 206
  3. 2022Co-Writing Screenplays and Theatre Scripts with Language Models: An Evaluation by Industry Professionalscited by 191
  4. 2023Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users' Viewscited by 145
  5. 2021Sparks: Inspiration for Science Writing using Language Modelscited by 80
  6. 2021The Impact of Multiple Parallel Phrase Suggestions on Email Input and Composition Behaviour of Native and Non-Native English Writerscited by 61
  7. 2022Beyond Text Generation: Supporting Writers with Continuous Automatic Text Summariescited by 47
  8. 2023VISAR: A Human-AI Argumentative Writing Assistant with Visual Programming and Rapid Draft Prototypingcited by 46
  9. 2023Choice Over Control: How Users Write with Large Language Models using Diegetic and Non-Diegetic Promptingcited by 36
  10. 2022Interacting with next-phrase suggestions: How suggestion systems aid and influence the cognitive processes of writingcited by 27
  11. 2021Human Evaluation of Creative NLG Systems: An Interdisciplinary Survey on Recent Paperscited by 18
  12. 2020Heteroglossia: In-Situ Story Ideation with the Crowdcited by 12
2 more
  1. 2023Predicting the Quality of Revisions in Argumentative Writingcited by 7
  2. 2022User or Labor: An Interaction Framework for Human-Machine Relationships in NLPcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.