mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CT-Eval: Benchmarking Chinese Text-to-Table Performance in Large Language Models

arXiv 2405.12174 ↗First posted 20 May 2024cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-Table aims to generate structured tables to convey the key information from unstructured documents. Existing text-to-table datasets are typically oriented English, limiting the research in non-English languages. Meanwhile, the emergence of large language models (LLMs) has shown great success as general task solvers in multi-lingual settings (e.g., ChatGPT), theoretically enabling text-to-table in other languages. In this paper, we propose a Chinese text-to-table dataset, CT-Eval, to benchmark LLMs on this task. Our preliminary analysis of English text-to-table datasets highlights two key factors for dataset construction: data diversity and data hallucination. Inspired by this, the CT-Eval dataset selects a popular Chinese multidisciplinary online encyclopedia as the source and covers 28 domains to ensure data diversity. To minimize data hallucination, we first train an LLM to judge and filter out the task samples with hallucination, then employ human annotators to clean the hallucinations in the validation and testing sets. After this process, CT-Eval contains 88.6K task samples. Using CT-Eval, we evaluate the performance of open-source and closed-source LLMs. Our results reveal that zero-shot LLMs (including GPT-4) still have a significant performance gap compared with human judgment. Furthermore, after fine-tuning, open-source LLMs can significantly improve their text-to-table ability, outperforming GPT-4 by a large margin. In short, CT-Eval not only helps researchers evaluate and quickly understand the Chinese text-to-table ability of existing LLMs but also serves as a valuable resource to significantly improve the text-to-table performance of LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2024.

Builds on

20 of 29 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  4. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  5. 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,378
  6. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
  7. 2021GLM: General Language Model Pretraining with Autoregressive Blank Infillingcited by 1,026
  8. 2023Baichuan 2: Open Large-scale Language Modelscited by 664
  9. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 420
  10. 2023Efficient and Effective Text Encoding for Chinese LLaMA and Alpacacited by 302
  11. 2017The E2E Dataset: New Challenges For End-to-End Generationcited by 252
  12. 2017Challenges in Data-to-Document Generationcited by 226
8 more
  1. 2023Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERTcited by 155
  2. 2021Going Full-TILT Boogie on Document Understanding with Text-Image-Layout Transformercited by 134
  3. 2018A Closer Look at Deep Learning Heuristics: Learning rate restarts, Warmup and Distillationcited by 110
  4. 2023Exploring the Feasibility of ChatGPT for Event Extractioncited by 76
  5. 2021Text-to-Table: A New Way of Information Extractioncited by 47
  6. 2018Table-to-Text: Describing Table Region with Natural Languagecited by 41
  7. 2023A Sequence-to-Sequence&Set Model for Text-to-Table Generationcited by 16
  8. 2022STable: Table Generation Framework for Encoder-Decoder Modelscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.