mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Blackbox Adaptation for Medical Image Segmentation

arXiv 2405.10913 ↗First posted 17 May 2024cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, various large foundation models have been proposed for image segmentation. There models are often trained on large amounts of data corresponding to general computer vision tasks. Hence, these models do not perform well on medical data. There have been some attempts in the literature to perform parameter-efficient finetuning of such foundation models for medical image segmentation. However, these approaches assume that all the parameters of the model are available for adaptation. But, in many cases, these models are released as APIs or blackboxes, with no or limited access to the model parameters and data. In addition, finetuning methods also require a significant amount of compute, which may not be available for the downstream task. At the same time, medical data can't be shared with third-party agents for finetuning due to privacy reasons. To tackle these challenges, we pioneer a blackbox adaptation technique for prompted medical image segmentation, called BAPS. BAPS has two components - (i) An Image-Prompt decoder (IP decoder) module that generates visual prompts given an image and a prompt, and (ii) A Zero Order Optimization (ZOO) Method, called SPSA-GC that is used to update the IP decoder without the need for backpropagating through the foundation model. Thus, our method does not require any knowledge about the foundation model's weights or gradients. We test BAPS on four different modalities and show that our method can improve the original model's performance by around 4%.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2024.

Builds on

20 of 27 references.

References · 20

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  4. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  5. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
  6. 2019Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 657
  7. 2017Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentationscited by 614
  8. 2019Kvasir-SEG: A Segmented Polyp Datasetcited by 588
  9. 2023Segment Everything Everywhere All at Oncecited by 546
  10. 2023Medical SAM Adapter: Adapting Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 485
  11. 2022RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts with Reinforcement Learningcited by 361
  12. 2023Customized Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 277
8 more
  1. 2022Black-Box Tuning for Language-Model-as-a-Servicecited by 254
  2. 2023A Comprehensive Capability Analysis of GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 Series Modelscited by 244
  3. 20192017 Robotic Instrument Segmentation Challengecited by 166
  4. 2020Medical Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 163
  5. 2020A Primer on Zeroth-Order Optimization in Signal Processing and Machine Learningcited by 160
  6. 2023BlackVIP: Black-Box Visual Prompting for Robust Transfer Learningcited by 70
  7. 2022BBTv2: Towards a Gradient-Free Future with Large Language Modelscited by 53
  8. 2024Foundation Models for Biomedical Image Segmentation: A Surveycited by 28

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.