Artificial Intelligence for the Internal Democracy of Political Parties
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The article argues that AI can enhance the measurement and implementation of democratic processes within political parties, known as Intra-Party Democracy (IPD). It identifies the limitations of traditional methods for measuring IPD, which often rely on formal parameters, self-reported data, and tools like surveys. Such limitations lead to the collection of partial data, rare updates, and significant demands on resources. To address these issues, the article suggests that specific data management and Machine Learning (ML) techniques, such as natural language processing and sentiment analysis, can improve the measurement (ML about) and practice (ML for) of IPD. The article concludes by considering some of the principal risks of ML for IPD, including concerns over data privacy, the potential for manipulation, and the dangers of overreliance on technology.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2024.
Builds on
4 of 71 references.
References · 4
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2015Incremental Gradient, Subgradient, and Proximal Methods for Convex Optimization: A Surveycited by 45
- 2020Sentiment Analysis: Automatically Detecting Valence, Emotions, and Other Affectual States from Textcited by 26
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026How to Detect and Measure the AI Dangers to Democracycited by 0
- 2026How to Detect and Measure the AI Dangers to Democracy14 Jun 2026