Beyond Flesch-Kincaid: Prompt-based Metrics Improve Difficulty Classification of Educational Texts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Using large language models (LLMs) for educational applications like dialogue-based teaching is a hot topic. Effective teaching, however, requires teachers to adapt the difficulty of content and explanations to the education level of their students. Even the best LLMs today struggle to do this well. If we want to improve LLMs on this adaptation task, we need to be able to measure adaptation success reliably. However, current Static metrics for text difficulty, like the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease score, are known to be crude and brittle. We, therefore, introduce and evaluate a new set of Prompt-based metrics for text difficulty. Based on a user study, we create Prompt-based metrics as inputs for LLMs. They leverage LLM's general language understanding capabilities to capture more abstract and complex features than Static metrics. Regression experiments show that adding our Prompt-based metrics significantly improves text difficulty classification over Static metrics alone. Our results demonstrate the promise of using LLMs to evaluate text adaptation to different education levels.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2024.
Builds on
8 of 34 references.
References · 8
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
- 2023Flesch or Fumble? Evaluating Readability Standard Alignment of Instruction-Tuned Language Modelscited by 17
- 2023Know Your Audience: Do LLMs Adapt to Different Age and Education Levels?cited by 16
- 2021Simple or Complex? Complexity-Controllable Question Generation with Soft Templates and Deep Mixture of Experts Modelcited by 8
- 2024Do LLMs Implicitly Determine the Suitable Text Difficulty for Users?cited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 3.
9 papers.
- 2025Biased Tales: Cultural and Topic Bias in Generating Children's Storiescited by 15
- 2025Multilingual Performance Biases of Large Language Models in Educationcited by 9
- 2025Alignment Drift in CEFR-prompted LLMs for Interactive Spanish Tutoringcited by 6
- 2025Opportunities and Challenges of LLMs in Education: An NLP Perspectivecited by 6
- 2026PATS: Personality-Aware Teaching Strategies with Large Language Model Tutorscited by 4
- 2025Rethinking the Role of Text Complexity in Language Model Pretrainingcited by 2
- 2025Readability Reconsidered: A Cross-Dataset Analysis of Reference-Free Metricscited by 2
- 2026Knowledge without Wisdom: Measuring Misalignment between LLMs and Intended Impactcited by 2
- 2026Incentives Of EdTech: A Systematic Review Of EduNLP Researchcited by 0
- 2026Incentives Of EdTech: A Systematic Review Of EduNLP Research13 May 2026
- 2026Knowledge without Wisdom: Measuring Misalignment between LLMs and Intended Impact1 Mar 2026
- 2026PATS: Personality-Aware Teaching Strategies with Large Language Model Tutors13 Jan 2026
- 2025Readability Reconsidered: A Cross-Dataset Analysis of Reference-Free Metrics17 Oct 2025
- 2025Rethinking the Role of Text Complexity in Language Model Pretraining20 Sep 2025
- 2025Biased Tales: Cultural and Topic Bias in Generating Children's Stories9 Sep 2025
- 2025Opportunities and Challenges of LLMs in Education: An NLP Perspective30 Jul 2025
- 2025Alignment Drift in CEFR-prompted LLMs for Interactive Spanish Tutoring13 May 2025
- 2025Multilingual Performance Biases of Large Language Models in Education24 Apr 2025