mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Clinician-Preferred Segmentation: Leveraging Human-in-the-Loop for Test Time Adaptation in Medical Image Segmentation

arXiv 2405.08270 ↗First posted 14 May 2024cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning-based medical image segmentation models often face performance degradation when deployed across various medical centers, largely due to the discrepancies in data distribution. Test Time Adaptation (TTA) methods, which adapt pre-trained models to test data, have been employed to mitigate such discrepancies. However, existing TTA methods primarily focus on manipulating Batch Normalization (BN) layers or employing prompt and adversarial learning, which may not effectively rectify the inconsistencies arising from divergent data distributions. In this paper, we propose a novel Human-in-the-loop TTA (HiTTA) framework that stands out in two significant ways. First, it capitalizes on the largely overlooked potential of clinician-corrected predictions, integrating these corrections into the TTA process to steer the model towards predictions that coincide more closely with clinical annotation preferences. Second, our framework conceives a divergence loss, designed specifically to diminish the prediction divergence instigated by domain disparities, through the careful calibration of BN parameters. Our HiTTA is distinguished by its dual-faceted capability to acclimatize to the distribution of test data whilst ensuring the model's predictions align with clinical expectations, thereby enhancing its relevance in a medical context. Extensive experiments on a public dataset underscore the superiority of our HiTTA over existing TTA methods, emphasizing the advantages of integrating human feedback and our divergence loss in enhancing the model's performance and adaptability across diverse medical centers.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2024.

Builds on

16 of 27 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
  2. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
  3. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  4. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
  5. 2021Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Analysis: A Surveycited by 351
  6. 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
  7. 2023TTN: A Domain-Shift Aware Batch Normalization in Test-Time Adaptationcited by 101
  8. 2020TaskNorm: Rethinking Batch Normalization for Meta-Learningcited by 50
  9. 2019Boundary and Entropy-driven Adversarial Learning for Fundus Image Segmentationcited by 46
  10. 2023Devil is in Channels: Contrastive Single Domain Generalization for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 30
  11. 2023Each Test Image Deserves A Specific Prompt: Continual Test-Time Adaptation for 2D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 29
  12. 2023DomainAdaptor: A Novel Approach to Test-time Adaptationcited by 20
4 more
  1. 2022ProSFDA: Prompt Learning based Source-free Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 18
  2. 2024Active Test-Time Adaptation: Theoretical Analyses and An Algorithmcited by 18
  3. 2021Modeling Annotator Preference and Stochastic Annotation Error for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 12
  4. 2023Transformer-based Annotation Bias-aware Medical Image Segmentationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.