mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Active Learning with Simple Questions

arXiv 2405.07937 ↗First posted 13 May 2024cs.LG cs.DScited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider an active learning setting where a learner is presented with a pool S of n unlabeled examples belonging to a domain X and asks queries to find the underlying labeling that agrees with a target concept h^* ∈ H. In contrast to traditional active learning that queries a single example for its label, we study more general region queries that allow the learner to pick a subset of the domain T subset X and a target label y and ask a labeler whether h^*(x) = y for every example in the set T cap S. Such more powerful queries allow us to bypass the limitations of traditional active learning and use significantly fewer rounds of interactions to learn but can potentially lead to a significantly more complex query language. Our main contribution is quantifying the trade-off between the number of queries and the complexity of the query language used by the learner. We measure the complexity of the region queries via the VC dimension of the family of regions. We show that given any hypothesis class H with VC dimension d, one can design a region query family Q with VC dimension O(d) such that for every set of n examples S subset X and every h^* ∈ H, a learner can submit O(d log n) queries from Q to a labeler and perfectly label S. We show a matching lower bound by designing a hypothesis class H with VC dimension d and a dataset S subset X of size n such that any learning algorithm using any query class with VC dimension less than O(d) must make poly(n) queries to label S perfectly. Finally, we focus on well-studied hypothesis classes including unions of intervals, high-dimensional boxes, and d-dimensional halfspaces, and obtain stronger results. In particular, we design learning algorithms that (i) are computationally efficient and (ii) work even when the queries are not answered based on the learner's pool of examples S but on some unknown superset L of S

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2024.

Builds on

22 of 49 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 379
  2. 2014Minimax Analysis of Active Learningcited by 61
  3. 2017Clustering with Noisy Queriescited by 34
  4. 2016Clustering with Same-Cluster Queriescited by 29
  5. 2017Active classification with comparison queriescited by 27
  6. 2019The Power of Comparisons for Actively Learning Linear Classifierscited by 20
  7. 2020Noise-tolerant, Reliable Active Classification with Comparison Queriescited by 17
  8. 2021Forster Decomposition and Learning Halfspaces with Noisecited by 16
  9. 2020Point Location and Active Learning: Learning Halfspaces Almost Optimallycited by 13
  10. 2017On Communication Complexity of Classification Problemscited by 11
  11. 2022A Strongly Polynomial Algorithm for Approximate Forster Transforms and its Application to Halfspace Learningcited by 11
  12. 2021Exact Recovery of Clusters in Finite Metric Spaces Using Oracle Queriescited by 9
10 more
  1. 2019Bounds in Query Learningcited by 8
  2. 2021Bounded Memory Active Learning through Enriched Queriescited by 8
  3. 2022Clustering with Queries under Semi-Random Noisecited by 8
  4. 2018Generalized comparison trees for point-location problemscited by 5
  5. 2022Active Learning with Label Comparisonscited by 5
  6. 2022Optimal Clustering with Noisy Queries via Multi-Armed Banditcited by 5
  7. 2019Active Learning a Convex Body in Low Dimensionscited by 3
  8. 2022Active Learning Polynomial Threshold Functionscited by 3
  9. 2022Active Learning of Classifiers with Label and Seed Queriescited by 2
  10. 2023Self-Directed Linear Classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

4 papers.