Optimizing Class-Level Probability Reweighting Coefficients for Equitable Prompting Accuracy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Even as we engineer LLMs for alignment and safety, they often uncover biases from pre-training data's statistical regularities (from disproportionate co-occurrences to stereotypical associations mirroring human cognitive biases). This leads to persistent, uneven class accuracy in classification and QA. Such per-class accuracy disparities are not inherently resolved by architectural/training evolutions or data scaling, making post-hoc correction essential for equitable performance. To mitigate LLM class accuracy imbalance, we develop a post-hoc probability reweighting method that directly optimizes for non-differentiable performance-driven and fairness-aligned metrics, through a novel COBias metric that highlights disparities in class accuracies. This post-hoc bias mitigation method is grounded in discrete optimization with nonlinear integer programming (NIP) objectives and an efficient metaheuristic solution framework with theoretical convergence guarantees. Operating model-agnostically, it learns reweighting coefficients from output class probabilities to adjust LLM inference outputs without internal weight updates. Evaluations demonstrate its effectiveness: reducing COBias (61% relative reduction), increasing overall accuracy (18% relative increase), and achieving robust within-task generalization across diverse prompt configurations.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2024.
Builds on
16 of 36 references.
References · 16
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
- 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,271
- 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,239
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,081
- 2020Domain-Specific Language Model Pretraining for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 996
- 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
- 2021Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Rightcited by 256
- 2019Negated and Misprimed Probes for Pretrained Language Models: Birds Can Talk, But Cannot Flycited by 240
4 more
- 2023Batch Calibration: Rethinking Calibration for In-Context Learning and Prompt Engineeringcited by 91
- 2023To Repeat or Not To Repeat: Insights from Scaling LLM under Token-Crisiscited by 88
- 2020Robustness May Be at Odds with Fairness: An Empirical Study on Class-wise Accuracycited by 45
- 2021System Combination for Grammatical Error Correction Based on Integer Programmingcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.