In Situ AI Prototyping: Infusing Multimodal Prompts into Mobile Settings with MobileMaker
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in multimodal large language models (LLMs) have made it easier to rapidly prototype AI-powered features, especially for mobile use cases. However, gathering early, mobile-situated user feedback on these AI prototypes remains challenging. The broad scope and flexibility of LLMs means that, for a given use-case-specific prototype, there is a crucial need to understand the wide range of in-the-wild input users are likely to provide and their in-context expectations for the AI's behavior. To explore the concept of in situ AI prototyping and testing, we created MobileMaker: a platform that enables designers to rapidly create and test mobile AI prototypes directly on devices. This tool also enables testers to make on-device, in-the-field revisions of prototypes using natural language. In an exploratory study with 16 participants, we explored how user feedback on prototypes created with MobileMaker compares to that of existing prototyping tools (e.g., Figma, prompt editors). Our findings suggest that MobileMaker prototypes enabled more serendipitous discovery of: model input edge cases, discrepancies between AI's and user's in-context interpretation of the task, and contextual signals missed by the AI. Furthermore, we learned that while the ability to make in-the-wild revisions led users to feel more fulfilled as active participants in the design process, it might also constrain their feedback to the subset of changes perceived as more actionable or implementable by the prototyping tool.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024MobileAIBench: Benchmarking LLMs and LMMs for On-Device Use Cases
- 2026Do LLMs Need to See Everything? A Benchmark and Study of Failures in LLM-driven Smartphone Automation using Screentext vs. Screenshots
- 2024Constraining Participation: Affordances of Feedback Features in Interfaces to Large Language Models
- 2024Generative AI in Multimodal User Interfaces: Trends, Challenges, and Cross-Platform Adaptability
- 2024MobileAgentBench: An Efficient and User-Friendly Benchmark for Mobile LLM Agents
- 2024Foundations and Recent Trends in Multimodal Mobile Agents: A Survey
- 2025FingerTip 20K: A Benchmark for Proactive and Personalized Mobile LLM Agents
- 2023Mobile-Env: Building Qualified Evaluation Benchmarks for LLM-GUI Interaction