AnchorGT: Efficient and Flexible Attention Architecture for Scalable Graph Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph Transformers (GTs) have significantly advanced the field of graph representation learning by overcoming the limitations of message-passing graph neural networks (GNNs) and demonstrating promising performance and expressive power. However, the quadratic complexity of self-attention mechanism in GTs has limited their scalability, and previous approaches to address this issue often suffer from expressiveness degradation or lack of versatility. To address this issue, we propose AnchorGT, a novel attention architecture for GTs with global receptive field and almost linear complexity, which serves as a flexible building block to improve the scalability of a wide range of GT models. Inspired by anchor-based GNNs, we employ structurally important k-dominating node set as anchors and design an attention mechanism that focuses on the relationship between individual nodes and anchors, while retaining the global receptive field for all nodes. With its intuitive design, AnchorGT can easily replace the attention module in various GT models with different network architectures and structural encodings, resulting in reduced computational overhead without sacrificing performance. In addition, we theoretically prove that AnchorGT attention can be strictly more expressive than Weisfeiler-Lehman test, showing its superiority in representing graph structures. Our experiments on three state-of-the-art GT models demonstrate that their AnchorGT variants can achieve better results while being faster and significantly more memory efficient.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2024.
Builds on
27 of 35 references.
References · 27
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
- 2017MoleculeNet: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learningcited by 1,037
- 2018Predict then Propagate: Graph Neural Networks meet Personalized PageRankcited by 987
- 2019Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networkscited by 964
- 2020Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 857
- 2022Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformercited by 702
- 2020Benchmarking Graph Neural Networkscited by 672
- 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 653
15 more
- 2021Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral Attentioncited by 468
- 2017Residual Gated Graph ConvNetscited by 341
- 2021OGB-LSC: A Large-Scale Challenge for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 328
- 2021Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation?cited by 318
- 2022Long Range Graph Benchmarkcited by 258
- 2020Iterative Deep Graph Learning for Graph Neural Networks: Better and Robust Node Embeddingscited by 212
- 2023NodeFormer: A Scalable Graph Structure Learning Transformer for Node Classificationcited by 207
- 2019Position-aware Graph Neural Networkscited by 203
- 2022Structure-Aware Transformer for Graph Representation Learningcited by 191
- 2021DropGNN: Random Dropouts Increase the Expressiveness of Graph Neural Networkscited by 117
- 2021Global Self-Attention as a Replacement for Graph Convolutioncited by 113
- 2023Attending to Graph Transformerscited by 81
- 2022Hierarchical Graph Transformer with Adaptive Node Samplingcited by 72
- 2022GRPE: Relative Positional Encoding for Graph Transformercited by 67
- 2021Gophormer: Ego-Graph Transformer for Node Classificationcited by 63
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.