mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Modelling Protein Complexes

arXiv 2405.02299 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2024cs.CE cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AlphaFold can be used for both single-chain and multi-chain protein structure prediction, while the latter becomes extremely challenging as the number of chains increases. In this work, by taking each chain as a node and assembly actions as edges, we show that an acyclic undirected connected graph can be used to predict the structure of multi-chain protein complexes (a.k.a., protein complex modelling, PCM). However, there are still two challenges: 1) The huge combinatorial optimization space of NN-2 (N is the number of chains) for the PCM problem can easily lead to high computational cost. 2) The scales of protein complexes exhibit distribution shift due to variance in chain numbers, which calls for the generalization in modelling complexes of various scales. To address these challenges, we propose GAPN, a Generative Adversarial Policy Network powered by domain-specific rewards and adversarial loss through policy gradient for automatic PCM prediction. Specifically, GAPN learns to efficiently search through the immense assembly space and optimize the direct docking reward through policy gradient. Importantly, we design an adversarial reward function to enhance the receptive field of our model. In this way, GAPN will simultaneously focus on a specific batch of complexes and the global assembly rules learned from complexes with varied chain numbers. Empirically, we have achieved both significant accuracy (measured by RMSD and TM-Score) and efficiency improvements compared to leading PCM softwares.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2024.

Builds on

28 of 55 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  4. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  5. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  6. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  7. 2015Pointer Networkscited by 882
  8. 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
  9. 2016Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 600
  10. 2017Learning Combinatorial Optimization Algorithms over Graphscited by 557
  11. 2018Reinforcement Learning for Solving the Vehicle Routing Problemcited by 327
  12. 2018Learning to Adapt in Dynamic, Real-World Environments Through Meta-Reinforcement Learningcited by 270
16 more
  1. 2022Rethinking Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly Detectioncited by 185
  2. 2017Imitation from Observation: Learning to Imitate Behaviors from Raw Video via Context Translationcited by 167
  3. 2022Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 158
  4. 2023All in One: Multi-task Prompting for Graph Neural Networkscited by 147
  5. 2018Meta-Reinforcement Learning of Structured Exploration Strategiescited by 128
  6. 2023A Tutorial on Meta-Reinforcement Learningcited by 102
  7. 2021Independent SE(3)-Equivariant Models for End-to-End Rigid Protein Dockingcited by 81
  8. 2017Adversarial Feature Matching for Text Generationcited by 58
  9. 2023GADBench: Revisiting and Benchmarking Supervised Graph Anomaly Detectioncited by 57
  10. 2019Semi-Supervised Graph Classification: A Hierarchical Graph Perspectivecited by 55
  11. 2019Predicting Path Failure In Time-Evolving Graphscited by 54
  12. 2016Model-Free Imitation Learning with Policy Optimizationcited by 52
  13. 2022Wiener Graph Deconvolutional Network Improves Graph Self-Supervised Learningcited by 13
  14. 2022Handling Missing Data via Max-Entropy Regularized Graph Autoencodercited by 12
  15. 2023Learning Harmonic Molecular Representations on Riemannian Manifoldcited by 8
  16. 2023SyNDock: N Rigid Protein Docking via Learnable Group Synchronizationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.