mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A fuzzy loss for ontology classification

arXiv 2405.02083 ↗First posted 3 May 2024cs.AI cs.LOcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models are often unaware of the inherent constraints of the task they are applied to. However, many downstream tasks require logical consistency. For ontology classification tasks, such constraints include subsumption and disjointness relations between classes. In order to increase the consistency of deep learning models, we propose a fuzzy loss that combines label-based loss with terms penalising subsumption- or disjointness-violations. Our evaluation on the ChEBI ontology shows that the fuzzy loss is able to decrease the number of consistency violations by several orders of magnitude without decreasing the classification performance. In addition, we use the fuzzy loss for unsupervised learning. We show that this can further improve consistency on data from a

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2024.

Builds on

10 of 30 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,239
  2. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
  3. 2019Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming in DeepProbLogcited by 389
  4. 2017A Semantic Loss Function for Deep Learning with Symbolic Knowledgecited by 267
  5. 2020Logic Tensor Networkscited by 197
  6. 2020Logical Neural Networkscited by 118
  7. 2020Analyzing Differentiable Fuzzy Logic Operatorscited by 100
  8. 2023The Roles of Symbols in Neural-based AI: They are Not What You Think!cited by 4
  9. 2023Ontology Pre-training for Poison Predictioncited by 2
  10. 2022ESC-Rules: Explainable, Semantically Constrained Rule Setscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.