mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adversarial Botometer: Adversarial Analysis for Social Bot Detection

arXiv 2405.02016 ↗First posted 3 May 2024cs.SI cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Social bots play a significant role in many online social networks (OSN) as they imitate human behavior. This fact raises difficult questions about their capabilities and potential risks. Given the recent advances in Generative AI (GenAI), social bots are capable of producing highly realistic and complex content that mimics human creativity. As the malicious social bots emerge to deceive people with their unrealistic content, identifying them and distinguishing the content they produce has become an actual challenge for numerous social platforms. Several approaches to this problem have already been proposed in the literature, but the proposed solutions have not been widely evaluated. To address this issue, we evaluate the behavior of a text-based bot detector in a competitive environment where some scenarios are proposed: textitFirst, the tug-of-war between a bot and a bot detector is examined. It is interesting to analyze which party is more likely to prevail and which circumstances influence these expectations. In this regard, we model the problem as a synthetic adversarial game in which a conversational bot and a bot detector are engaged in strategic online interactions. textitSecond, the bot detection model is evaluated under attack examples generated by a social bot; to this end, we poison the dataset with attack examples and evaluate the model performance under this condition. textitFinally, to investigate the impact of the dataset, a cross-domain analysis is performed. Through our comprehensive evaluation of different categories of social bots using two benchmark datasets, we were able to demonstrate some achivement that could be utilized in future works.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2024.

Builds on

18 of 38 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,068
  4. 2016SeqGAN: Sequence Generative Adversarial Nets with Policy Gradientcited by 375
  5. 2017A Survey on Dialogue Systems: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 162
  6. 2016Energy-based Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 119
  7. 2014The Rise of Social Botscited by 96
  8. 2020Your GAN is Secretly an Energy-based Model and You Should use Discriminator Driven Latent Samplingcited by 71
  9. 2017Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterizationcited by 64
  10. 2019Scalable and Generalizable Social Bot Detection through Data Selectioncited by 59
  11. 2017The paradigm-shift of social spambots: Evidence, theories, and tools for the arms racecited by 49
  12. 2020Topic-Aware Multi-turn Dialogue Modelingcited by 46
6 more
  1. 2018Deep Neural Networks for Bot Detectioncited by 37
  2. 2020Charting the Landscape of Online Cryptocurrency Manipulationcited by 15
  3. 2020Assessing the risks of "infodemics" in response to COVID-19 epidemicscited by 14
  4. 2018Detecting Deceptive Reviews using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 11
  5. 2018Cashtag piggybacking: uncovering spam and bot activity in stock microblogs on Twittercited by 6
  6. 2018Its All in a Name: Detecting and Labeling Bots by Their Namecited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.