mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RankSHAP: Shapley Value Based Feature Attributions for Learning to Rank

arXiv 2405.01848 ↗First posted 3 May 2024cs.IR cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Numerous works propose post-hoc, model-agnostic explanations for learning to rank, focusing on ordering entities by their relevance to a query through feature attribution methods. However, these attributions often weakly correlate or contradict each other, confusing end users. We adopt an axiomatic game-theoretic approach, popular in the feature attribution community, to identify a set of fundamental axioms that every ranking-based feature attribution method should satisfy. We then introduce Rank-SHAP, extending classical Shapley values to ranking. We evaluate the RankSHAP framework through extensive experiments on two datasets, multiple ranking methods and evaluation metrics. Additionally, a user study confirms RankSHAP's alignment with human intuition. We also perform an axiomatic analysis of existing rank attribution algorithms to determine their compliance with our proposed axioms. Ultimately, our aim is to equip practitioners with a set of axiomatically backed feature attribution methods for studying IR ranking models, that ensure generality as well as consistency.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2024.

Builds on

25 of 49 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  6. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  7. 2019Passage Re-ranking with BERTcited by 629
  8. 2020Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Modelcited by 373
  9. 2023Fine-Tuning LLaMA for Multi-Stage Text Retrievalcited by 271
  10. 2022PRADA: Practical Black-Box Adversarial Attacks against Neural Ranking Modelscited by 44
  11. 2014A Weighted Correlation Index for Rankings with Tiescited by 41
  12. 2021NeuralNDCG: Direct Optimisation of a Ranking Metric via Differentiable Relaxation of Sortingcited by 39
13 more
  1. 2020Feature Importance Ranking for Deep Learningcited by 31
  2. 2021Explain and Predict, and then Predict Againcited by 29
  3. 2020One word at a time: adversarial attacks on retrieval modelscited by 23
  4. 2019A study on the Interpretability of Neural Retrieval Models using DeepSHAPcited by 19
  5. 2018EXS: Explainable Search Using Local Model Agnostic Interpretabilitycited by 18
  6. 2022Explainable Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 15
  7. 2021Towards Axiomatic Explanations for Neural Ranking Modelscited by 7
  8. 2022Rank-LIME: Local Model-Agnostic Feature Attribution for Learning to Rankcited by 7
  9. 2022Explaining Preferences with Shapley Valuescited by 6
  10. 2021Explaining Documents' Relevance to Search Queriescited by 5
  11. 2020Valid Explanations for Learning to Rank Modelscited by 4
  12. 2022Finding Inverse Document Frequency Information in BERTcited by 3
  13. 2020Interpretable Learning-to-Rank with Generalized Additive Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.