Beyond MOS: Subjective Image Quality Score Preprocessing Method Based on Perceptual Similarity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Image quality assessment often relies on raw opinion scores provided by subjects in subjective experiments, which can be noisy and unreliable. To address this issue, postprocessing procedures such as ITU-R BT.500, ITU-T P.910, and ITU-T P.913 have been standardized to clean up the original opinion scores. These methods use annotator-based statistical priors, but they do not take into account extensive information about the image itself, which limits their performance in less annotated scenarios. Generally speaking, image quality datasets usually contain similar scenes or distortions, and it is inevitable for subjects to compare images to score a reasonable score when scoring. Therefore, In this paper, we proposed Subjective Image Quality Score Preprocessing Method perceptual similarity Subjective Preprocessing (PSP), which exploit the perceptual similarity between images to alleviate subjective bias in less annotated scenarios. Specifically, we model subjective scoring as a conditional probability model based on perceptual similarity with previously scored images, called subconscious reference scoring. The reference images are stored by a neighbor dictionary, which is obtained by a normalized vector dot-product based nearest neighbor search of the images' perceptual depth features. Then the preprocessed score is updated by the exponential moving average (EMA) of the subconscious reference scoring, called similarity regularized EMA. Our experiments on multiple datasets (LIVE, TID2013, CID2013) show that this method can effectively remove the bias of the subjective scores. Additionally, Experiments prove that the Preprocesed dataset can improve the performance of downstream IQA tasks very well.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2024.
Builds on
16 of 38 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
- 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 301
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 224
- 2018A Closer Look at Deep Learning Heuristics: Learning rate restarts, Warmup and Distillationcited by 110
- 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
- 2020Transformer for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 76
- 2019Self-Knowledge Distillation in Natural Language Processingcited by 60
4 more
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels via Sparse Regularizationcited by 38
- 2022Perceptual Quality Assessment of Omnidirectional Imagescited by 34
- 2017Towards a quality metric for dense light fieldscited by 15
- 2020A Simple Model for Subject Behavior in Subjective Experimentscited by 14
Built on by
Not cited yet.