mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AI-powered Code Review with LLMs: Early Results

arXiv 2404.18496 ↗First posted 29 Apr 2024cs.SEcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we present a novel approach to improving software quality and efficiency through a Large Language Model (LLM)-based model designed to review code and identify potential issues. Our proposed LLM-based AI agent model is trained on large code repositories. This training includes code reviews, bug reports, and documentation of best practices. It aims to detect code smells, identify potential bugs, provide suggestions for improvement, and optimize the code. Unlike traditional static code analysis tools, our LLM-based AI agent has the ability to predict future potential risks in the code. This supports a dual goal of improving code quality and enhancing developer education by encouraging a deeper understanding of best practices and efficient coding techniques. Furthermore, we explore the model's effectiveness in suggesting improvements that significantly reduce post-release bugs and enhance code review processes, as evidenced by an analysis of developer sentiment toward LLM feedback. For future work, we aim to assess the accuracy and efficiency of LLM-generated documentation updates in comparison to manual methods. This will involve an empirical study focusing on manually conducted code reviews to identify code smells and bugs, alongside an evaluation of best practice documentation, augmented by insights from developer discussions and code reviews. Our goal is to not only refine the accuracy of our LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 13; 2026: 6.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Large Language Model-Based Agents for Software Engineering: A Surveycited by 173
  2. 2025Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AIcited by 39
  3. 2024Towards Resilient and Efficient LLMs: A Comparative Study of Efficiency, Performance, and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 22
  4. 2025Large Language Model (LLM) for Software Security: Code Analysis, Malware Analysis, Reverse Engineeringcited by 15
  5. 2024CRScore: Grounding Automated Evaluation of Code Review Comments in Code Claims and Smellscited by 8
  6. 2025CodeVisionary: An Agent-based Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models in Code Generationcited by 6
  7. 2025RobuNFR: Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Non-Functional Requirements Aware Code Generationcited by 5
  8. 2025Automated Code Review Using Large Language Models at Ericsson: An Experience Reportcited by 5
  9. 2025Uncovering Systematic Failures of LLMs in Verifying Code Against Natural Language Specificationscited by 5
  10. 2026Understanding Dominant Themes in Reviewing Agentic AI-authored Codecited by 4
  11. 2026Are LLMs Reliable Code Reviewers? Systematic Overcorrection in Requirement Conformance Judgementcited by 4
  12. 2026Code Review Agent Benchmarkcited by 4
10 more
  1. 2025Trust Me, I Know This Function: Hijacking LLM Static Analysis using Biascited by 3
  2. 2025Designing LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering Tasks: Quality Attributes, Design Patterns and Rationalecited by 3
  3. 2025Augmenting Large Language Models with Static Code Analysis for Automated Code Quality Improvementscited by 2
  4. 2025Autonomous Legacy Web Application Upgrades Using a Multi-Agent Systemcited by 1
  5. 2025A Blueprint for AI-Driven Software Quality: Integrating LLMs with Established Standardscited by 1
  6. 2026SEVRA-BENCH: Social Engineering of Vulnerabilities in Review Agentscited by 1
  7. 2025Grounded AI for Code Review: Resource-Efficient Large-Model Serving in Enterprise Pipelinescited by 0
  8. 2025From Specification to Service: Accelerating API-First Development Using Multi-Agent Systemscited by 0
  9. 2026More than a Judge: An Empirical Study of Agent-Human Interaction in Crowdsourced Testing Assessmentcited by 0
  10. 2026From Human-Centric to Agentic Code Review: The Impact of Different Generations of Generative AI Technology on Review Qualitycited by 0