Middle Architecture Criteria
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mid-level ontologies are used to integrate terminologies and data across disparate domains. There are, however, no clear, defensible criteria for determining whether a given ontology should count as mid-level, because we lack a rigorous characterization of what the middle level of generality is supposed to contain. Attempts to provide such a characterization have failed, we believe, because they have focused on the goal of specifying what is characteristic of those single ontologies that have been advanced as mid-level ontologies. Unfortunately, single ontologies of this sort are generally a mixture of top- and mid-level, and sometimes even of domain-level terms. To gain clarity, we aim to specify the necessary and sufficient conditions for a collection of one or more ontologies to inhabit what we call a mid-level architecture.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2024.
Builds on
1 of 47 references.
References · 1
- 2023Knowledge Graphs: Opportunities and Challengescited by 70
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Ontology Enabled Hybrid Modeling and Simulationcited by 0
- 2025Ontology Enabled Hybrid Modeling and Simulation14 Jun 2025