mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Separation capacity of linear reservoirs with random connectivity matrix

arXiv 2404.17429 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2024stat.ML cs.LG math.PRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A natural hypothesis for the success of reservoir computing in generic tasks is the ability of the untrained reservoir to map distinct input time series to separable reservoir states, a property we term separation capacity. In this work, we develop a rigorous mathematical framework for analysing the separation capacity of random linear reservoirs. We show that the expected separation induced by a random reservoir is completely characterised by the spectral properties of a positive semi-definite matrix naturally associated with the connectivity matrix, which we call the generalised matrix of moments. Taking Gaussian connectivity matrices as an example, we investigate how separation depends on the reservoir dimension N, the scaling of the connectivity matrix, and structural assumptions such as symmetry. In the symmetric case, we show that, although the classical scaling N-1/2 yields the most balanced separation for large reservoirs, the quality of separation inevitably deteriorates as the length of the input time series increases. In contrast, for reservoirs with independent and identically distributed connectivity entries, we prove that the classical scaling N-1/2 is asymptotically optimal from the perspective of separation and derive quantitative bounds describing the evolution of separation with the time horizon. Finally, numerical experiments suggest a strong practical connection between balanced separation profiles and downstream learning performance. Beyond providing a theoretical justification for several common reservoir design choices, our results introduce separation capacity as a tractable and informative framework for the analysis of random reservoirs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2024.

Builds on

12 of 42 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018Echo state networks are universalcited by 86
  2. 2020Approximation Bounds for Random Neural Networks and Reservoir Systemscited by 52
  3. 2018Reservoir Computing Universality With Stochastic Inputscited by 48
  4. 2017Universal discrete-time reservoir computers with stochastic inputs and linear readouts using non-homogeneous state-affine systemscited by 39
  5. 2017Gated Orthogonal Recurrent Units: On Learning to Forgetcited by 31
  6. 2020On the Curse of Memory in Recurrent Neural Networks: Approximation and Optimization Analysiscited by 26
  7. 2017full-FORCE: A Target-Based Method for Training Recurrent Networkscited by 16
  8. 2021The Separation Capacity of Random Neural Networkscited by 14
  9. 2019Dynamical Systems as Temporal Feature Spacescited by 12
  10. 2020Memory and forecasting capacities of nonlinear recurrent networkscited by 11
  11. 2016The Asymptotic Performance of Linear Echo State Neural Networkscited by 6
  12. 2017The difference between memory and prediction in linear recurrent networkscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.