mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Separation Capacity of Random Neural Networks

arXiv 2108.00207 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2021cs.LG math.ST stat.THcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks with random weights appear in a variety of machine learning applications, most prominently as the initialization of many deep learning algorithms and as a computationally cheap alternative to fully learned neural networks. In the present article, we enhance the theoretical understanding of random neural networks by addressing the following data separation problem: under what conditions can a random neural network make two classes X^-, X^+ subset ℝd (with positive distance) linearly separable? We show that a sufficiently large two-layer ReLU-network with standard Gaussian weights and uniformly distributed biases can solve this problem with high probability. Crucially, the number of required neurons is explicitly linked to geometric properties of the underlying sets X^-, X^+ and their mutual arrangement. This instance-specific viewpoint allows us to overcome the usual curse of dimensionality (exponential width of the layers) in non-pathological situations where the data carries low-complexity structure. We quantify the relevant structure of the data in terms of a novel notion of mutual complexity (based on a localized version of Gaussian mean width), which leads to sound and informative separation guarantees. We connect our result with related lines of work on approximation, memorization, and generalization.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2021.

Builds on

31 of 66 references.

References · 31

  1. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  2. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  3. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  4. 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 787
  5. 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 770
  6. 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 574
  7. 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 573
  8. 2018A Mean Field View of the Landscape of Two-Layers Neural Networkscited by 466
  9. 2018Learning Overparameterized Neural Networks via Stochastic Gradient Descent on Structured Datacited by 261
  10. 2019Generalization Bounds of Stochastic Gradient Descent for Wide and Deep Neural Networkscited by 222
  11. 2019Mean-field theory of two-layers neural networks: dimension-free bounds and kernel limitcited by 187
  12. 2016Generalization Properties of Learning with Random Featurescited by 164
19 more
  1. 2015On the Equivalence between Kernel Quadrature Rules and Random Feature Expansionscited by 138
  2. 2019An Improved Analysis of Training Over-parameterized Deep Neural Networkscited by 121
  3. 2019Polylogarithmic width suffices for gradient descent to achieve arbitrarily small test error with shallow ReLU networkscited by 121
  4. 2020Random Features for Kernel Approximation: A Survey on Algorithms, Theory, and Beyondcited by 109
  5. 2019On the Power and Limitations of Random Features for Understanding Neural Networkscited by 103
  6. 2018Overparameterized Nonlinear Learning: Gradient Descent Takes the Shortest Path?cited by 88
  7. 2019How Much Over-parameterization Is Sufficient to Learn Deep ReLU Networks?cited by 84
  8. 2018Small ReLU networks are powerful memorizers: a tight analysis of memorization capacitycited by 78
  9. 2019Generalization Error Bounds of Gradient Descent for Learning Over-parameterized Deep ReLU Networkscited by 60
  10. 2015Deep Neural Networks with Random Gaussian Weights: A Universal Classification Strategy?cited by 41
  11. 2021On the Approximation Power of Two-Layer Networks of Random ReLUscited by 29
  12. 2019Gradient Descent can Learn Less Over-parameterized Two-layer Neural Networks on Classification Problemscited by 24
  13. 2020Random Vector Functional Link Networks for Function Approximation on Manifoldscited by 19
  14. 2020A Corrective View of Neural Networks: Representation, Memorization and Learningcited by 13
  15. 2019The Benefits of Over-parameterization at Initialization in Deep ReLU Networkscited by 8
  16. 2015Near-Optimal Bounds for Binary Embeddings of Arbitrary Setscited by 5
  17. 2014Compressive classification and the rare eclipse problemcited by 4
  18. 2018Robust one-bit compressed sensing with partial circulant matricescited by 4
  19. 2020Binarized Johnson-Lindenstrauss embeddingscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort: