mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cost-Sensitive Uncertainty-Based Failure Recognition for Object Detection

arXiv 2404.17427 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2024cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Object detectors in real-world applications often fail to detect objects due to varying factors such as weather conditions and noisy input. Therefore, a process that mitigates false detections is crucial for both safety and accuracy. While uncertainty-based thresholding shows promise, previous works demonstrate an imperfect correlation between uncertainty and detection errors. This hinders ideal thresholding, prompting us to further investigate the correlation and associated cost with different types of uncertainty. We therefore propose a cost-sensitive framework for object detection tailored to user-defined budgets on the two types of errors, missing and false detections. We derive minimum thresholding requirements to prevent performance degradation and define metrics to assess the applicability of uncertainty for failure recognition. Furthermore, we automate and optimize the thresholding process to maximize the failure recognition rate w.r.t. the specified budget. Evaluation on three autonomous driving datasets demonstrates that our approach significantly enhances safety, particularly in challenging scenarios. Leveraging localization aleatoric uncertainty and softmax-based entropy only, our method boosts the failure recognition rate by 36-60% compared to conventional approaches. Code is available at https://mos-ks.github.io/publications.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2024.

Builds on

23 of 42 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  4. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  5. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  6. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
  7. 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,288
  8. 2017Cascade R-CNN: Delving into High Quality Object Detectioncited by 1,276
  9. 2019EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detectioncited by 1,020
  10. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
  11. 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 422
  12. 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
11 more
  1. 2019Addressing Failure Prediction by Learning Model Confidencecited by 186
  2. 2017Dropout Sampling for Robust Object Detection in Open-Set Conditionscited by 112
  3. 2020HEBO Pushing The Limits of Sample-Efficient Hyperparameter Optimisationcited by 83
  4. 2021Active Learning for Deep Object Detection via Probabilistic Modelingcited by 79
  5. 2019BayesOD: A Bayesian Approach for Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Object Detectorscited by 68
  6. 2018Evaluating Merging Strategies for Sampling-based Uncertainty Techniques in Object Detectioncited by 51
  7. 2021Recalibration of Aleatoric and Epistemic Regression Uncertainty in Medical Imagingcited by 18
  8. 2016Introspective Perception: Learning to Predict Failures in Vision Systemscited by 17
  9. 2019Did You Miss the Sign? A False Negative Alarm System for Traffic Sign Detectorscited by 14
  10. 2018Decoupled Classification Refinement: Hard False Positive Suppression for Object Detectioncited by 7
  11. 2023Overcoming the Limitations of Localization Uncertainty: Efficient & Exact Non-Linear Post-Processing and Calibrationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.