How Does Conversation Length Impact User's Satisfaction? A Case Study of Length-Controlled Conversations with LLM-Powered Chatbots
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Users can discuss a wide range of topics with large language models (LLMs), but they do not always prefer solving problems or getting information through lengthy conversations. This raises an intriguing HCI question: How does instructing LLMs to engage in longer or shorter conversations affect conversation quality? In this paper, we developed two Slack chatbots using GPT-4 with the ability to vary conversation lengths and conducted a user study. Participants asked the chatbots both highly and less conversable questions, engaging in dialogues with 0, 3, 5, and 7 conversational turns. We found that the conversation quality does not differ drastically across different conditions, while participants had mixed reactions. Our study demonstrates LLMs' ability to change conversation length and the potential benefits for users resulting from such changes, but we caution that changes in text form may not necessarily imply changes in quality or content.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2025Evaluating LLM-based Agents for Multi-Turn Conversations: A Surveycited by 56
- 2025MIRROR: Multimodal Cognitive Reframing Therapy for Rolling with Resistancecited by 13
- 2025OnGoal: Tracking and Visualizing Conversational Goals in Multi-Turn Dialogue with Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025LLM Content Moderation and User Satisfaction: Evidence from Response Refusals in Chatbot Arenacited by 6
- 2026AI-exhibited Personality Traits Can Shape Human Self-concept through Conversationscited by 3
- 2026Does My Chatbot Have an Agenda? Understanding Human and AI Agency in Human-Human-like Chatbot Interactioncited by 3
- 2025Introducing the Swiss Food Knowledge Graph: AI for Context-Aware Nutrition Recommendationcited by 0
- 2026Pingquanqi (Equalizer): A Cross-Domain Sociotechnical Framework for Human-Agent Interaction Governancecited by 0
- 2026Pingquanqi (Equalizer): A Cross-Domain Sociotechnical Framework for Human-Agent Interaction Governance25 Jun 2026
- 2026Does My Chatbot Have an Agenda? Understanding Human and AI Agency in Human-Human-like Chatbot Interaction30 Jan 2026
- 2026AI-exhibited Personality Traits Can Shape Human Self-concept through Conversations19 Jan 2026
- 2025OnGoal: Tracking and Visualizing Conversational Goals in Multi-Turn Dialogue with Large Language Models28 Aug 2025
- 2025Introducing the Swiss Food Knowledge Graph: AI for Context-Aware Nutrition Recommendation14 Jul 2025
- 2025MIRROR: Multimodal Cognitive Reframing Therapy for Rolling with Resistance16 Apr 2025
- 2025Evaluating LLM-based Agents for Multi-Turn Conversations: A Survey28 Mar 2025
- 2025LLM Content Moderation and User Satisfaction: Evidence from Response Refusals in Chatbot Arena4 Jan 2025