mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Revisiting Relevance Feedback for CLIP-based Interactive Image Retrieval

arXiv 2404.16398 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2024cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many image retrieval studies use metric learning to train an image encoder. However, metric learning cannot handle differences in users' preferences, and requires data to train an image encoder. To overcome these limitations, we revisit relevance feedback, a classic technique for interactive retrieval systems, and propose an interactive CLIP-based image retrieval system with relevance feedback. Our retrieval system first executes the retrieval, collects each user's unique preferences through binary feedback, and returns images the user prefers. Even when users have various preferences, our retrieval system learns each user's preference through the feedback and adapts to the preference. Moreover, our retrieval system leverages CLIP's zero-shot transferability and achieves high accuracy without training. We empirically show that our retrieval system competes well with state-of-the-art metric learning in category-based image retrieval, despite not training image encoders specifically for each dataset. Furthermore, we set up two additional experimental settings where users have various preferences: one-label-based image retrieval and conditioned image retrieval. In both cases, our retrieval system effectively adapts to each user's preferences, resulting in improved accuracy compared to image retrieval without feedback. Overall, our work highlights the potential benefits of integrating CLIP with classic relevance feedback techniques to enhance image retrieval.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2024.

Builds on

23 of 40 references.

References · 23

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  4. 2017Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learningcited by 1,139
  5. 2021ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioningcited by 557
  6. 2020Rethinking Few-Shot Image Classification: a Good Embedding Is All You Need?cited by 435
  7. 2014Deep metric learning using Triplet networkcited by 421
  8. 2019Multi-Similarity Loss with General Pair Weighting for Deep Metric Learningcited by 368
  9. 2021MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessmentcited by 332
  10. 2020A Metric Learning Reality Checkcited by 317
  11. 2020Google Landmarks Dataset v2 -- A Large-Scale Benchmark for Instance-Level Recognition and Retrievalcited by 305
  12. 2018Composing Text and Image for Image Retrieval - An Empirical Odysseycited by 234
11 more
  1. 2017No Fuss Distance Metric Learning using Proxiescited by 225
  2. 2020Proxy Anchor Loss for Deep Metric Learningcited by 195
  3. 2016Joint Detection and Identification Feature Learning for Person Searchcited by 190
  4. 2017Beyond triplet loss: a deep quadruplet network for person re-identificationcited by 172
  5. 2023Pic2Word: Mapping Pictures to Words for Zero-shot Composed Image Retrievalcited by 155
  6. 2017Automatic Spatially-aware Fashion Concept Discoverycited by 132
  7. 2020Few-Shot Classification with Feature Map Reconstruction Networkscited by 116
  8. 2023CLIP for All Things Zero-Shot Sketch-Based Image Retrieval, Fine-Grained or Notcited by 79
  9. 2020Compositional Learning of Image-Text Query for Image Retrievalcited by 57
  10. 2023GeneCIS: A Benchmark for General Conditional Image Similaritycited by 46
  11. 2022Revisiting a kNN-based Image Classification System with High-capacity Storagecited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.