VISLA Benchmark: Evaluating Embedding Sensitivity to Semantic and Lexical Alterations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite their remarkable successes, state-of-the-art language models face challenges in grasping certain important semantic details. This paper introduces the VISLA (Variance and Invariance to Semantic and Lexical Alterations) benchmark, designed to evaluate the semantic and lexical understanding of language models. VISLA presents a 3-way semantic (in)equivalence task with a triplet of sentences associated with an image, to evaluate both vision-language models (VLMs) and unimodal language models (ULMs). An evaluation involving 34 VLMs and 20 ULMs reveals surprising difficulties in distinguishing between lexical and semantic variations. Spatial semantics encoded by language models also appear to be highly sensitive to lexical information. Notably, text encoders of VLMs demonstrate greater sensitivity to semantic and lexical variations than unimodal text encoders. Our contributions include the unification of image-to-text and text-to-text retrieval tasks, an off-the-shelf evaluation without fine-tuning, and assessing LMs' semantic (in)variance in the presence of lexical alterations. The results highlight strengths and weaknesses across diverse vision and unimodal language models, contributing to a deeper understanding of their capabilities. % VISLA enables a rigorous evaluation, shedding light on language models' capabilities in handling semantic and lexical nuances. Data and code will be made available at https://github.com/Sri-Harsha/visla_benchmark.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2024.
Builds on
62 of 76 references.
References · 62
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,322
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
38 more
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,612
- 2020MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 1,414
- 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,224
- 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,216
- 2021FLAVA: A Foundational Language And Vision Alignment Modelcited by 646
- 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 635
- 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 623
- 2020Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embeddingcited by 621
- 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
- 2020Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillationcited by 591
- 2022Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Mask-adapted CLIPcited by 560
- 2021Editing Factual Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 548
- 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 523
- 2021Sentence-T5: Scalable Sentence Encoders from Pre-trained Text-to-Text Modelscited by 462
- 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
- 2022One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddingscited by 329
- 2023Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Modelscited by 295
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Followingcited by 290
- 2022Visual Spatial Reasoningcited by 288
- 2021Multi-Grained Vision Language Pre-Training: Aligning Texts with Visual Conceptscited by 255
- 2023SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionalitycited by 238
- 2023Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Role-Play Promptingcited by 220
- 2023LVLM-eHub: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 217
- 2021Decoupling Zero-Shot Semantic Segmentationcited by 198
- 2022CREPE: Can Vision-Language Foundation Models Reason Compositionally?cited by 177
- 2022SegCLIP: Patch Aggregation with Learnable Centers for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 162
- 2022CyCLIP: Cyclic Contrastive Language-Image Pretrainingcited by 127
- 2022VL-CheckList: Evaluating Pre-trained Vision-Language Models with Objects, Attributes and Relationscited by 113
- 2023AnglE-optimized Text Embeddingscited by 98
- 2022AltCLIP: Altering the Language Encoder in CLIP for Extended Language Capabilitiescited by 84
- 2022Teaching Structured Vision&Language Concepts to Vision&Language Modelscited by 71
- 2023ALIP: Adaptive Language-Image Pre-training with Synthetic Captioncited by 70
- 2022Fine-Grained Semantically Aligned Vision-Language Pre-Trainingcited by 68
- 2022Why is Winoground Hard? Investigating Failures in Visuolinguistic Compositionalitycited by 44
- 2023Incorporating Structured Representations into Pretrained Vision & Language Models Using Scene Graphscited by 39
50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Evaluating Robustness of Vision-Language Models Under Noisy Conditions
- 2023Synthesize, Diagnose, and Optimize: Towards Fine-Grained Vision-Language Understanding
- 2024SUGARCREPE++ Dataset: Vision-Language Model Sensitivity to Semantic and Lexical Alterations
- 2024Seeing Syntax: Uncovering Syntactic Learning Limitations in Vision-Language Models
- 2026VLMs Need Words: Vision Language Models Ignore Visual Detail In Favor of Semantic Anchors
- 2025Test-Time Consistency in Vision Language Models
- 2025VLURes: Benchmarking VLM Visual and Linguistic Understanding in Low-Resource Languages
- 2023ReForm-Eval: Evaluating Large Vision Language Models via Unified Re-Formulation of Task-Oriented Benchmarks