mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Computational analysis of the language of pain: a systematic review

arXiv 2404.16226 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Objectives: This study aims to systematically review the literature on the computational processing of the language of pain, or pain narratives, whether generated by patients or physicians, identifying current trends and challenges. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted to select relevant studies on the computational processing of the language of pain and answer pre-defined research questions. Data extraction and synthesis were performed to categorize selected studies according to their primary purpose and outcome, patient and pain population, textual data, computational methodology, and outcome targets. Results: Physician-generated language of pain, specifically from clinical notes, was the most used data. Tasks included patient diagnosis and triaging, identification of pain mentions, treatment response prediction, biomedical entity extraction, correlation of linguistic features with clinical states, and lexico-semantic analysis of pain narratives. Only one study included previous linguistic knowledge on pain utterances in their experimental setup. Most studies targeted their outcomes for physicians, either directly as clinical tools or as indirect knowledge. The least targeted stage of clinical pain care was self-management, in which patients are most involved. Affective and sociocultural dimensions were the least studied domains. Only one study measured how physician performance on clinical tasks improved with the inclusion of the proposed algorithm. Discussion: This review found that future research should focus on analyzing patient-generated language of pain, developing patient-centered resources for self-management and patient-empowerment, exploring affective and sociocultural aspects of pain, and measuring improvements in physician performance when aided by the proposed tools.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2024.

Builds on

4 of 72 references.

References · 4

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2018SMHD: A Large-Scale Resource for Exploring Online Language Usage for Multiple Mental Health Conditionscited by 73
  3. 2020Measuring Pain in Sickle Cell Disease using Clinical Textcited by 2
  4. 2022Chronic pain patient narratives allow for the estimation of current pain intensitycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.