Reinforcement of Explainability of ChatGPT Prompts by Embedding Breast Cancer Self-Screening Rules into AI Responses
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Addressing the global challenge of breast cancer, this research explores the fusion of generative AI, focusing on ChatGPT 3.5 turbo model, and the intricacies of breast cancer risk assessment. The research aims to evaluate ChatGPT's reasoning capabilities, emphasizing its potential to process rules and provide explanations for screening recommendations. The study seeks to bridge the technology gap between intelligent machines and clinicians by demonstrating ChatGPT's unique proficiency in natural language reasoning. The methodology employs a supervised prompt-engineering approach to enforce detailed explanations for ChatGPT's recommendations. Synthetic use cases, generated algorithmically, serve as the testing ground for the encoded rules, evaluating the model's processing prowess. Findings highlight ChatGPT's promising capacity in processing rules comparable to Expert System Shells, with a focus on natural language reasoning. The research introduces the concept of reinforcement explainability, showcasing its potential in elucidating outcomes and facilitating user-friendly interfaces for breast cancer risk assessment.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2024.
Builds on
9 of 30 references.
References · 9
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,830
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
- 2021Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?cited by 326
- 2023Are Large Language Models Ready for Healthcare? A Comparative Study on Clinical Language Understandingcited by 40
- 2022Integrating Physiological Time Series and Clinical Notes with Transformer for Early Prediction of Sepsiscited by 14
- 2020No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using Space-Time Chipscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Evaluation of ChatGPT Family of Models for Biomedical Reasoning and Classification
- 2025Advice for Diabetes Self-Management by ChatGPT Models: Challenges and Recommendations
- 2024Critique of Impure Reason: Unveiling the reasoning behaviour of medical Large Language Models
- 2026BreastGPT: A Multimodal Large Language Model for the Full Spectrum of Breast Cancer Clinical Routine
- 2024Can Generative AI Support Patients' & Caregivers' Informational Needs? Towards Task-Centric Evaluation Of AI Systems
- 2025Reasoning LLMs in the Medical Domain: A Literature Survey
- 2025MTBBench: A Multimodal Sequential Clinical Decision-Making Benchmark in Oncology
- 2025From Explainability to Action: A Generative Operational Framework for Integrating XAI in Clinical Mental Health Screening