mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Lost in Space: Probing Fine-grained Spatial Understanding in Vision and Language Resamplers

arXiv 2404.13594 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An effective method for combining frozen large language models (LLM) and visual encoders involves a resampler module that creates a `visual prompt' which is provided to the LLM, along with the textual prompt. While this approach has enabled impressive performance across many coarse-grained tasks like image captioning and visual question answering, more fine-grained tasks that require spatial understanding have not been thoroughly examined. In this paper, we use textitdiagnostic classifiers to measure the extent to which the visual prompt produced by the resampler encodes spatial information. Our results show that this information is largely absent from the resampler output when kept frozen during training of the classifiers. However, when the resampler and classifier are trained jointly, we observe a significant performance boost. This shows that the compression achieved by the resamplers can in principle encode the requisite spatial information, but that more object-aware objectives are needed at the pretraining stage to facilitate this capability

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2024.

Builds on

24 of 36 references.

References · 24

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  5. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  6. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
  7. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
  8. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,876
  9. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,230
  10. 2015Generation and Comprehension of Unambiguous Object Descriptionscited by 904
  11. 2020Object-Centric Learning with Slot Attentioncited by 876
  12. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
12 more
  1. 2021MDETR -- Modulated Detection for End-to-End Multi-Modal Understandingcited by 819
  2. 2022EVA: Exploring the Limits of Masked Visual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 691
  3. 2021Perceiver IO: A General Architecture for Structured Inputs & Outputscited by 629
  4. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
  5. 2023Otter: A Multi-Modal Model with In-Context Instruction Tuningcited by 550
  6. 2023Ferret: Refer and Ground Anything Anywhere at Any Granularitycited by 509
  7. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 457
  8. 2023EVA-02: A Visual Representation for Neon Genesiscited by 381
  9. 2023OBELICS: An Open Web-Scale Filtered Dataset of Interleaved Image-Text Documentscited by 316
  10. 2019Gradio: Hassle-Free Sharing and Testing of ML Models in the Wildcited by 178
  11. 2021UniTAB: Unifying Text and Box Outputs for Grounded Vision-Language Modelingcited by 122
  12. 2021Probing Multimodal Embeddings for Linguistic Properties: the Visual-Semantic Casecited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

11 papers.