REQUAL-LM: Reliability and Equity through Aggregation in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The extensive scope of large language models (LLMs) across various domains underscores the critical importance of responsibility in their application, beyond natural language processing. In particular, the randomized nature of LLMs, coupled with inherent biases and historical stereotypes in data, raises critical concerns regarding reliability and equity. Addressing these challenges are necessary before using LLMs for applications with societal impact. Towards addressing this gap, we introduce REQUAL-LM, a novel method for finding reliable and equitable LLM outputs through aggregation. Specifically, we develop a Monte Carlo method based on repeated sampling to find a reliable output close to the mean of the underlying distribution of possible outputs. We formally define the terms such as reliability and bias, and design an equity-aware aggregation to minimize harmful bias while finding a highly reliable output. REQUAL-LM does not require specialized hardware, does not impose a significant computing load, and uses LLMs as a blackbox. This design choice enables seamless scalability alongside the rapid advancement of LLM technologies. Our system does not require retraining the LLMs, which makes it deployment ready and easy to adapt. Our comprehensive experiments using various tasks and datasets demonstrate that REQUAL- LM effectively mitigates bias and selects a more equitable response, specifically the outputs that properly represents minority groups.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2024.
Builds on
16 of 23 references.
References · 16
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 659
- 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMscited by 573
- 2023LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusioncited by 564
- 2022One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddingscited by 333
- 2020Measuring and Reducing Gendered Correlations in Pre-trained Modelscited by 224
- 2019Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Modelscited by 214
- 2019Queens are Powerful too: Mitigating Gender Bias in Dialogue Generationcited by 152
- 2021RedditBias: A Real-World Resource for Bias Evaluation and Debiasing of Conversational Language Modelscited by 149
- 2021Debiasing Pre-trained Contextualised Embeddingscited by 107
4 more
- 2023Double Equivariance for Inductive Link Prediction for Both New Nodes and New Relation Typescited by 21
- 2023Farewell to Aimless Large-scale Pretraining: Influential Subset Selection for Language Modelcited by 12
- 2023MILO: Model-Agnostic Subset Selection Framework for Efficient Model Training and Tuningcited by 9
- 2023Mitigating Voter Attribute Bias for Fair Opinion Aggregationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.