mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Toward a Realistic Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detection

arXiv 2404.10474 ↗First posted 16 Apr 2024cs.LG cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks are increasingly used in a wide range of technologies and services, but remain highly susceptible to out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, that is, drawn from a different distribution than the original training set. A common approach to address this issue is to endow deep neural networks with the ability to detect OOD samples. Several benchmarks have been proposed to design and validate OOD detection techniques. However, many of them are based on far-OOD samples drawn from very different distributions, and thus lack the complexity needed to capture the nuances of real-world scenarios. In this work, we introduce a comprehensive benchmark for OOD detection, based on ImageNet and Places365, that assigns individual classes as in-distribution or out-of-distribution depending on the semantic similarity with the training set. Several techniques can be used to determine which classes should be considered in-distribution, yielding benchmarks with varying properties. Experimental results on different OOD detection techniques show how their measured efficacy depends on the selected benchmark and how confidence-based techniques may outperform classifier-based ones on near-OOD samples.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2024.

Builds on

25 of 40 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  2. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  3. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  4. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
  5. 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,350
  6. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
  7. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
  8. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
  9. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
  10. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
  11. 2015Towards Open Set Deep Networkscited by 533
  12. 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
13 more
  1. 2020Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-distribution Image without Learning from Out-of-distribution Datacited by 408
  2. 2018Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problemcited by 323
  3. 2021Exploring the Limits of Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 283
  4. 2021MOS: Towards Scaling Out-of-distribution Detection for Large Semantic Spacecited by 233
  5. 2014Object Detectors Emerge in Deep Scene CNNscited by 178
  6. 2021A Unified Survey on Anomaly, Novelty, Open-Set, and Out-of-Distribution Detection: Solutions and Future Challengescited by 154
  7. 2021Learning Placeholders for Open-Set Recognitioncited by 121
  8. 2021Semantically Coherent Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 107
  9. 2020Exathlon: A Benchmark for Explainable Anomaly Detection over Time Seriescited by 56
  10. 2019Detecting semantic anomaliescited by 50
  11. 2021No True State-of-the-Art? OOD Detection Methods are Inconsistent across Datasetscited by 31
  12. 2019Detecting Out-of-Distribution Inputs in Deep Neural Networks Using an Early-Layer Outputcited by 20
  13. 2019Are Out-of-Distribution Detection Methods Effective on Large-Scale Datasets?cited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.