Post-Training Network Compression for 3D Medical Image Segmentation: Reducing Computational Efforts via Tucker Decomposition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We address the computational barrier of deploying advanced deep learning segmentation models in clinical settings by studying the efficacy of network compression through tensor decomposition. We propose a post-training Tucker factorization that enables the decomposition of pre-existing models to reduce computational requirements without impeding segmentation accuracy. We applied Tucker decomposition to the convolutional kernels of the TotalSegmentator (TS) model, an nnU-Net model trained on a comprehensive dataset for automatic segmentation of 117 anatomical structures. Our approach reduced the floating-point operations (FLOPs) and memory required during inference, offering an adjustable trade-off between computational efficiency and segmentation quality. This study utilized the publicly available TS dataset, employing various downsampling factors to explore the relationship between model size, inference speed, and segmentation performance. The application of Tucker decomposition to the TS model substantially reduced the model parameters and FLOPs across various compression rates, with limited loss in segmentation accuracy. We removed up to 88% of the model's parameters with no significant performance changes in the majority of classes after fine-tuning. Practical benefits varied across different graphics processing unit (GPU) architectures, with more distinct speed-ups on less powerful hardware. Post-hoc network compression via Tucker decomposition presents a viable strategy for reducing the computational demand of medical image segmentation models without substantially sacrificing accuracy. This approach enables the broader adoption of advanced deep learning technologies in clinical practice, offering a way to navigate the constraints of hardware capabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2024.
Builds on
13 of 24 references.
References · 13
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
- 2021The Medical Segmentation Decathloncited by 620
- 2022TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in CT imagescited by 597
- 2023Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Analysis: an Experimental Studycited by 291
- 2014Speeding-up Convolutional Neural Networks Using Fine-tuned CP-Decompositioncited by 199
- 2015Compression of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Fast and Low Power Mobile Applicationscited by 161
- 2023SAM3D: Segment Anything Model in Volumetric Medical Imagescited by 34
- 2024SegmentAnyBone: A Universal Model that Segments Any Bone at Any Location on MRIcited by 14
- 2020Compressing Recurrent Neural Networks Using Hierarchical Tucker Tensor Decompositioncited by 9
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.