mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Necessity of Collaboration for Online Model Selection with Decentralized Data

arXiv 2404.09494 ↗First posted 15 Apr 2024cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider online model selection with decentralized data over M clients, and study the necessity of collaboration among clients. Previous work proposed various federated algorithms without demonstrating their necessity,while we answer the question from a novel perspective of computational constraints. We prove lower bounds on the regret, and propose a federated algorithm and analyze the upper bound.Our results show (i) collaboration is unnecessary in the absence of computational constraints on clients; (ii) collaboration is necessary if the computational cost on each client is limited to o(K), where K is the number of candidate hypothesis spaces. We clarify the unnecessary nature of collaboration in previous federated algorithms for distributed online multi-kernel learning,and improve the regret bounds at a smaller computational and communication cost. Our algorithm relies on three new techniques including an improved Bernstein's inequality for martingale, a federated online mirror descent framework, and decoupling model selection and prediction, which might be of independent interest.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2024.

Builds on

26 of 55 references.

References · 26

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  3. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  4. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  5. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
  6. 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,046
  7. 2021A Field Guide to Federated Optimizationcited by 315
  8. 2020Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?cited by 151
  9. 2020Minibatch vs Local SGD for Heterogeneous Distributed Learningcited by 147
  10. 2016Corralling a Band of Bandit Algorithmscited by 100
  11. 2020Model Selection in Contextual Stochastic Bandit Problemscited by 71
  12. 2021Federated Linear Contextual Banditscited by 61
14 more
  1. 2019Model selection for contextual banditscited by 60
  2. 2020Bias no more: high-probability data-dependent regret bounds for adversarial bandits and MDPscited by 51
  3. 2017Parameter-free online learning via model selectioncited by 34
  4. 2021The Min-Max Complexity of Distributed Stochastic Convex Optimization with Intermittent Communicationcited by 31
  5. 2017Random Feature-based Online Multi-kernel Learning in Environments with Unknown Dynamicscited by 28
  6. 2020Online Active Model Selection for Pre-trained Classifierscited by 20
  7. 2022Tighter Regret Analysis and Optimization of Online Federated Learningcited by 14
  8. 2017Online Distributed Learning Over Networks in RKH Spaces Using Random Fourier Featurescited by 11
  9. 2023Personalized Online Federated Learning with Multiple Kernelscited by 11
  10. 2017Multi-scale Online Learning and its Applications to Online Auctionscited by 8
  11. 2023Federated Online and Bandit Convex Optimizationcited by 7
  12. 2023Enhanced Federated Optimization: Adaptive Unbiased Client Sampling with Reduced Variancecited by 2
  13. 2022Model Selection in Reinforcement Learning with General Function Approximationscited by 1
  14. 2023Improved Regret Bounds for Online Kernel Selection under Bandit Feedbackcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.