Structured Model Pruning for Efficient Inference in Computational Pathology
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent years have seen significant efforts to adopt Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare for various use cases, from computer-aided diagnosis to ICU triage. However, the size of AI models has been rapidly growing due to scaling laws and the success of foundational models, which poses an increasing challenge to leverage advanced models in practical applications. It is thus imperative to develop efficient models, especially for deploying AI solutions under resource-constrains or with time sensitivity. One potential solution is to perform model compression, a set of techniques that remove less important model components or reduce parameter precision, to reduce model computation demand. In this work, we demonstrate that model pruning, as a model compression technique, can effectively reduce inference cost for computational and digital pathology based analysis with a negligible loss of analysis performance. To this end, we develop a methodology for pruning the widely used U-Net-style architectures in biomedical imaging, with which we evaluate multiple pruning heuristics on nuclei instance segmentation and classification, and empirically demonstrate that pruning can compress models by at least 70% with a negligible drop in performance.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2024.
Builds on
23 of 38 references.
References · 23
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
- 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,129
- 2021A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inferencecited by 798
- 2017Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimmingcited by 673
- 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 578
11 more
- 2021RepVGG: Making VGG-style ConvNets Great Againcited by 520
- 2018HoVer-Net: Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Nuclei in Multi-Tissue Histology Imagescited by 387
- 2019On the Efficacy of Knowledge Distillationcited by 377
- 2020A Comprehensive Survey of Neural Architecture Search: Challenges and Solutionscited by 253
- 2023A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendationscited by 200
- 2020Characterising Bias in Compressed Modelscited by 162
- 2023Segment Anything Model (SAM) for Digital Pathology: Assess Zero-shot Segmentation on Whole Slide Imagingcited by 161
- 2022DepthShrinker: A New Compression Paradigm Towards Boosting Real-Hardware Efficiency of Compact Neural Networkscited by 19
- 2023Exploring Image Augmentations for Siamese Representation Learning with Chest X-Rayscited by 12
- 2021Resolution-Based Distillation for Efficient Histology Image Classificationcited by 10
- 2022Deep Neural Network Pruning for Nuclei Instance Segmentation in Hematoxylin & Eosin-Stained Histological Imagescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.