Detecting AI-Generated Images via CLIP
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As AI-generated image (AIGI) methods become more powerful and accessible, it has become a critical task to determine if an image is real or AI-generated. Because AIGI lack the signatures of photographs and have their own unique patterns, new models are needed to determine if an image is AI-generated. In this paper, we investigate the ability of the Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) architecture, pre-trained on massive internet-scale data sets, to perform this differentiation. We fine-tune CLIP on real images and AIGI from several generative models, enabling CLIP to determine if an image is AI-generated and, if so, determine what generation method was used to create it. We show that the fine-tuned CLIP architecture is able to differentiate AIGI as well or better than models whose architecture is specifically designed to detect AIGI. Our method will significantly increase access to AIGI-detecting tools and reduce the negative effects of AIGI on society, as our CLIP fine-tuning procedures require no architecture changes from publicly available model repositories and consume significantly less GPU resources than other AIGI detection models.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2024.
Builds on
14 of 30 references.
References · 14
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,988
- 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,355
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 847
- 2023Jailbreaking ChatGPT via Prompt Engineering: An Empirical Studycited by 498
- 2023DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 390
- 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forgetcited by 356
- 2023Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practicalcited by 290
- 2021Projected GANs Converge Fastercited by 208
- 2021Are GAN generated images easy to detect? A critical analysis of the state-of-the-artcited by 139
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2026A Comprehensive Dataset for Human vs. AI Generated Image Detectioncited by 4
- 2024Log-normal Mutations and their Use in Detecting Surreptitious Fake Imagescited by 1
- 2025CLIP Embeddings for AI-Generated Image Detection: A Few-Shot Study with Lightweight Classifiercited by 0
- 2026Chroma Clues: Leveraging Color Statistics to Detect Synthetic Imagescited by 0
- 2026On the Separation of Human and AI-Generated Images in CLIP Embedding Spacecited by 0
- 2026On the Separation of Human and AI-Generated Images in CLIP Embedding Space26 Aug 2026
- 2026Chroma Clues: Leveraging Color Statistics to Detect Synthetic Images1 Jun 2026
- 2026A Comprehensive Dataset for Human vs. AI Generated Image Detection2 Jan 2026
- 2025CLIP Embeddings for AI-Generated Image Detection: A Few-Shot Study with Lightweight Classifier15 May 2025
- 2024Log-normal Mutations and their Use in Detecting Surreptitious Fake Images23 Sep 2024