mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Small Models Are (Still) Effective Cross-Domain Argument Extractors

arXiv 2404.08579 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Effective ontology transfer has been a major goal of recent work on event argument extraction (EAE). Two methods in particular -- question answering (QA) and template infilling (TI) -- have emerged as promising approaches to this problem. However, detailed explorations of these techniques' ability to actually enable this transfer are lacking. In this work, we provide such a study, exploring zero-shot transfer using both techniques on six major EAE datasets at both the sentence and document levels. Further, we challenge the growing reliance on LLMs for zero-shot extraction, showing that vastly smaller models trained on an appropriate source ontology can yield zero-shot performance superior to that of GPT-3.5 or GPT-4.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2024.

Builds on

9 of 27 references.

References · 9

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  3. 2020Event Extraction by Answering (Almost) Natural Questionscited by 177
  4. 2021Document-Level Event Argument Extraction by Conditional Generationcited by 155
  5. 2022Prompt for Extraction? PAIE: Prompting Argument Interaction for Event Argument Extractioncited by 54
  6. 2021Document-level Entity-based Extraction as Template Generationcited by 33
  7. 2019Reading the Manual: Event Extraction as Definition Comprehensioncited by 26
  8. 2023A Unified View of Evaluation Metrics for Structured Predictioncited by 11
  9. 2022Asking the Right Questions in Low Resource Template Extractioncited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.