mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Practical Guidelines for Cell Segmentation Models Under Optical Aberrations in Microscopy

arXiv 2404.08549 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2024eess.IV cs.CV physics.bio-phcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cell segmentation is essential in biomedical research for analyzing cellular morphology and behavior. Deep learning methods, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have revolutionized cell segmentation by extracting intricate features from images. However, the robustness of these methods under microscope optical aberrations remains a critical challenge. This study evaluates cell image segmentation models under optical aberrations from fluorescence and bright field microscopy. By simulating different types of aberrations, including astigmatism, coma, spherical aberration, trefoil, and mixed aberrations, we conduct a thorough evaluation of various cell instance segmentation models using the DynamicNuclearNet (DNN) and LIVECell datasets, representing fluorescence and bright field microscopy cell datasets, respectively. We train and test several segmentation models, including the Otsu threshold method and Mask R-CNN with different network heads (FPN, C3) and backbones (ResNet, VGG, Swin Transformer), under aberrated conditions. Additionally, we provide usage recommendations for the Cellpose 2.0 Toolbox on complex cell degradation images. The results indicate that the combination of FPN and SwinS demonstrates superior robustness in handling simple cell images affected by minor aberrations. In contrast, Cellpose 2.0 proves effective for complex cell images under similar conditions. Furthermore, we innovatively propose the Point Spread Function Image Label Classification Model (PLCM). This model can quickly and accurately identify aberration types and amplitudes from PSF images, assisting researchers without optical training. Through PLCM, researchers can better apply our proposed cell segmentation guidelines.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2024.

Builds on

15 of 46 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  4. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  7. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  8. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  9. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  10. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  11. 2020SA-UNet: Spatial Attention U-Net for Retinal Vessel Segmentationcited by 70
  12. 2020Attention-Based Transformers for Instance Segmentation of Cells in Microstructurescited by 38
3 more
  1. 2021A Multi-Branch Hybrid Transformer Networkfor Corneal Endothelial Cell Segmentationcited by 18
  2. 2022Mixed-UNet: Refined Class Activation Mapping for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Multi-scale Inferencecited by 7
  3. 2023An Instance Segmentation Dataset of Yeast Cells in Microstructurescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.