mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Scaling (Down) CLIP: A Comprehensive Analysis of Data, Architecture, and Training Strategies

arXiv 2404.08197 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2024cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper investigates the performance of the Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) when scaled down to limited computation budgets. We explore CLIP along three dimensions: data, architecture, and training strategies. With regards to data, we demonstrate the significance of high-quality training data and show that a smaller dataset of high-quality data can outperform a larger dataset with lower quality. We also examine how model performance varies with different dataset sizes, suggesting that smaller ViT models are better suited for smaller datasets, while larger models perform better on larger datasets with fixed compute. Additionally, we provide guidance on when to choose a CNN-based architecture or a ViT-based architecture for CLIP training. We compare four CLIP training strategies - SLIP, FLIP, CLIP, and CLIP+Data Augmentation - and show that the choice of training strategy depends on the available compute resource. Our analysis reveals that CLIP+Data Augmentation can achieve comparable performance to CLIP using only half of the training data. This work provides practical insights into how to effectively train and deploy CLIP models, making them more accessible and affordable for practical use in various applications.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2024.

Builds on

30 of 34 references.

References · 30

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  6. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  7. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  8. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
  9. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  10. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  11. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  12. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
18 more
  1. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  2. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  3. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  4. 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
  5. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
  6. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  7. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
  8. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  9. 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 896
  10. 2022PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Modelcited by 762
  11. 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 572
  12. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
  13. 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 434
  14. 2022Scaling Language-Image Pre-training via Maskingcited by 317
  15. 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 248
  16. 2021Combined Scaling for Zero-shot Transfer Learningcited by 182
  17. 2022Quality Not Quantity: On the Interaction between Dataset Design and Robustness of CLIPcited by 97
  18. 2021No One Representation to Rule Them All: Overlapping Features of Training Methodscited by 57

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 5.

9 papers.