Uncertainty-guided annotation enhances segmentation with the human-in-the-loop
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning algorithms, often critiqued for their 'black box' nature, traditionally fall short in providing the necessary transparency for trusted clinical use. This challenge is particularly evident when such models are deployed in local hospitals, encountering out-of-domain distributions due to varying imaging techniques and patient-specific pathologies. Yet, this limitation offers a unique avenue for continual learning. The Uncertainty-Guided Annotation (UGA) framework introduces a human-in-the-loop approach, enabling AI to convey its uncertainties to clinicians, effectively acting as an automated quality control mechanism. UGA eases this interaction by quantifying uncertainty at the pixel level, thereby revealing the model's limitations and opening the door for clinician-guided corrections. We evaluated UGA on the Camelyon dataset for lymph node metastasis segmentation which revealed that UGA improved the Dice coefficient (DC), from 0.66 to 0.76 by adding 5 patches, and further to 0.84 with 10 patches. To foster broader application and community contribution, we have made our code accessible at
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2024.
Builds on
5 of 9 references.
References · 5
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2019Quantifying the effects of data augmentation and stain color normalization in convolutional neural networks for computational pathologycited by 172
- 2021Diminishing Uncertainty within the Training Pool: Active Learning for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 44
- 2022Uncertainty-Informed Deep Learning Models Enable High-Confidence Predictions for Digital Histopathologycited by 37
- 2021Structure-Preserving Multi-Domain Stain Color Augmentation using Style-Transfer with Disentangled Representationscited by 31
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024A Review of Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Probabilistic Image Segmentationcited by 6
- 2026Lost in the Folds: When Cross-Validation Is Not a Deep Ensemble for Uncertainty Estimationcited by 1
- 2025THIRDEYE: Cue-Aware Monocular Depth Estimation via Brain-Inspired Multi-Stage Fusioncited by 0
- 2025Bridging 3D Deep Learning and Curation for Analysis and High-Quality Segmentation in Practicecited by 0
- 2026Lost in the Folds: When Cross-Validation Is Not a Deep Ensemble for Uncertainty Estimation18 May 2026
- 2025Bridging 3D Deep Learning and Curation for Analysis and High-Quality Segmentation in Practice27 Nov 2025
- 2025THIRDEYE: Cue-Aware Monocular Depth Estimation via Brain-Inspired Multi-Stage Fusion25 Jun 2025
- 2024A Review of Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Probabilistic Image Segmentation25 Nov 2024