mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Event Grounded Criminal Court View Generation with Cooperative (Large) Language Models

arXiv 2404.07001 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the development of legal intelligence, Criminal Court View Generation has attracted much attention as a crucial task of legal intelligence, which aims to generate concise and coherent texts that summarize case facts and provide explanations for verdicts. Existing researches explore the key information in case facts to yield the court views. Most of them employ a coarse-grained approach that partitions the facts into broad segments (e.g., verdict-related sentences) to make predictions. However, this approach fails to capture the complex details present in the case facts, such as various criminal elements and legal events. To this end, in this paper, we propose an Event Grounded Generation (EGG) method for criminal court view generation with cooperative (Large) Language Models, which introduces the fine-grained event information into the generation. Specifically, we first design a LLMs-based extraction method that can extract events in case facts without massive annotated events. Then, we incorporate the extracted events into court view generation by merging case facts and events. Besides, considering the computational burden posed by the use of LLMs in the extraction phase of EGG, we propose a LLMs-free EGG method that can eliminate the requirement for event extraction using LLMs in the inference phase. Extensive experimental results on a real-world dataset clearly validate the effectiveness of our proposed method.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2024.

Builds on

15 of 40 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  5. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  6. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  7. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  8. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
  9. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,292
  10. 2023DISC-LawLLM: Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Intelligent Legal Servicescited by 120
  11. 2018Interpretable Charge Predictions for Criminal Cases: Learning to Generate Court Views from Fact Descriptionscited by 36
  12. 2022LEVEN: A Large-Scale Chinese Legal Event Detection Datasetcited by 36
3 more
  1. 2019CJRC: A Reliable Human-Annotated Benchmark DataSet for Chinese Judicial Reading Comprehensioncited by 26
  2. 2023PanGu-π: Enhancing Language Model Architectures via Nonlinearity Compensationcited by 17
  3. 2023Constructing Tree-based Index for Efficient and Effective Dense Retrievalcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

7 papers.