Convolution-based Probability Gradient Loss for Semantic Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we introduce a novel Convolution-based Probability Gradient (CPG) loss for semantic segmentation. It employs convolution kernels similar to the Sobel operator, capable of computing the gradient of pixel intensity in an image. This enables the computation of gradients for both ground-truth and predicted category-wise probabilities. It enhances network performance by maximizing the similarity between these two probability gradients. Moreover, to specifically enhance accuracy near the object's boundary, we extract the object boundary based on the ground-truth probability gradient and exclusively apply the CPG loss to pixels belonging to boundaries. CPG loss proves to be highly convenient and effective. It establishes pixel relationships through convolution, calculating errors from a distinct dimension compared to pixel-wise loss functions such as cross-entropy loss. We conduct qualitative and quantitative analyses to evaluate the impact of the CPG loss on three well-established networks (DeepLabv3-Resnet50, HRNetV2-OCR, and LRASPP_MobileNet_V3_Large) across three standard segmentation datasets (Cityscapes, COCO-Stuff, ADE20K). Our extensive experimental results consistently and significantly demonstrate that the CPG loss enhances the mean Intersection over Union.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2024.
Builds on
31 of 48 references.
References · 31
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
- 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
- 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 1,417
19 more
- 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Human Pose Estimationcited by 1,339
- 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
- 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,063
- 2016COCO-Stuff: Thing and Stuff Classes in Contextcited by 858
- 2018BiSeNet: Bilateral Segmentation Network for Real-time Semantic Segmentationcited by 645
- 2019Segmentation Transformer: Object-Contextual Representations for Semantic Segmentationcited by 573
- 2014Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFscited by 552
- 2018Learning Pixel-level Semantic Affinity with Image-level Supervision for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 321
- 2020BiSeNet V2: Bilateral Network with Guided Aggregation for Real-time Semantic Segmentationcited by 294
- 2018Boundary loss for highly unbalanced segmentationcited by 187
- 2020Hierarchical Multi-Scale Attention for Semantic Segmentationcited by 183
- 2018ESPNet: Efficient Spatial Pyramid of Dilated Convolutions for Semantic Segmentationcited by 133
- 2021Leveraging Auxiliary Tasks with Affinity Learning for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 77
- 2021InverseForm: A Loss Function for Structured Boundary-Aware Segmentationcited by 65
- 2019Region Mutual Information Loss for Semantic Segmentationcited by 49
- 2018Adaptive Affinity Fields for Semantic Segmentationcited by 48
- 2015Semantic Image Segmentation with Task-Specific Edge Detection Using CNNs and a Discriminatively Trained Domain Transformcited by 46
- 2021Active Boundary Loss for Semantic Segmentationcited by 40
- 2015Semantic Segmentation with Boundary Neural Fieldscited by 37
Built on by
Not cited yet.