Learning Embeddings with Centroid Triplet Loss for Object Identification in Robotic Grasping
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Foundation models are a strong trend in deep learning and computer vision. These models serve as a base for applications as they require minor or no further fine-tuning by developers to integrate into their applications. Foundation models for zero-shot object segmentation such as Segment Anything (SAM) output segmentation masks from images without any further object information. When they are followed in a pipeline by an object identification model, they can perform object detection without training. Here, we focus on training such an object identification model. A crucial practical aspect for an object identification model is to be flexible in input size. As object identification is an image retrieval problem, a suitable method should handle multi-query multi-gallery situations without constraining the number of input images (e.g. by having fixed-size aggregation layers). The key solution to train such a model is the centroid triplet loss (CTL), which aggregates image features to their centroids. CTL yields high accuracy, avoids misleading training signals and keeps the model input size flexible. In our experiments, we establish a new state of the art on the ArmBench object identification task, which shows general applicability of our model. We furthermore demonstrate an integrated unseen object detection pipeline on the challenging HOPE dataset, which requires fine-grained detection. There, our pipeline matches and surpasses related methods which have been trained on dataset-specific data.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2024.
Builds on
25 of 32 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 844
- 2023Fast Segment Anythingcited by 286
- 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 225
- 2022MegaPose: 6D Pose Estimation of Novel Objects via Render & Comparecited by 198
- 2015Particular object retrieval with integral max-pooling of CNN activationscited by 160
- 2023SAM-6D: Segment Anything Model Meets Zero-Shot 6D Object Pose Estimationcited by 115
- 2018Falling Things: A Synthetic Dataset for 3D Object Detection and Pose Estimationcited by 92
13 more
- 2023CNOS: A Strong Baseline for CAD-based Novel Object Segmentationcited by 86
- 2020Unseen Object Instance Segmentation for Robotic Environmentscited by 85
- 20226-DoF Pose Estimation of Household Objects for Robotic Manipulation: An Accessible Dataset and Benchmarkcited by 85
- 2021On the Unreasonable Effectiveness of Centroids in Image Retrievalcited by 45
- 2022How to Fine-Tune Vision Models with SGDcited by 23
- 2017Cartman: The low-cost Cartesian Manipulator that won the Amazon Robotics Challengecited by 19
- 2022Mean Shift Mask Transformer for Unseen Object Instance Segmentationcited by 19
- 2023ARMBench: An Object-centric Benchmark Dataset for Robotic Manipulationcited by 18
- 2021Multi-View Fusion for Multi-Level Robotic Scene Understandingcited by 17
- 2021Unknown Object Segmentation from Stereo Imagescited by 16
- 2018Fast Object Learning and Dual-arm Coordination for Cluttered Stowing, Picking, and Packingcited by 12
- 2023RoboLLM: Robotic Vision Tasks Grounded on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2023DoUnseen: Tuning-Free Class-Adaptive Object Detection of Unseen Objects for Robotic Graspingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.